US v. Google: all the news from the search antitrust showdown
See all Stories
A
Google’s attorney cites a “laundry list” of reasons selling Chrome (and maybe Android) is bad.
Schmidtlein says not only is it not justified by the law, the tangible harms outweigh “speculative benefits” to the competitive landscape. There’s “voluminous evidence” Chrome succeeded through innovation.
Mehta says the outcome of this plan is “less speculative” than many of the other proposals, and “in some sense, it’s from a judicial standpoint, a little cleaner and a little more elegant and a little less speculative than some of the other remedies.”
Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates.
Most Popular
Most Popular
- Epic just won its Google lawsuit again, and Android may never be the same
- All the news from Nintendo’s July 2025 Direct showcase
- Inside the LG G5’s shocking last-place finish at the 2025 TV Shootout
- Google’s Pixel Tablet is $190 off for a limited time
- Sharge added a rechargeable battery to its sleek retractable charger
