Makena Kelly | The Verge The Verge is about technology and how it makes us feel. Founded in 2011, we offer our audience everything from breaking news to reviews to award-winning features and investigations, on our site, in video, and in podcasts. 2023-11-08T17:00:00+00:00 https://www.theverge.com/authors/makena-kelly/rss https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/01/verge-rss-large_80b47e.png?w=150&h=150&crop=1 Makena Kelly <![CDATA[How to watch the third Republican debate]]> https://www.theverge.com/2023/11/8/23952218/how-to-watch-gop-republican-debate-trump-desantis-vivek 2023-11-08T12:00:00-05:00 2023-11-08T12:00:00-05:00

The third Republican debate ahead of the 2024 presidential election is set to take place tonight in Miami, Florida. The field has narrowed down to five candidates who will likely spar on issues like the Israel-Hamas war, especially as Congress prepares a new funding package for Israel. Front-runner Donald Trump is, yet again, not among them.

If you’re interested in tuning in, here’s what you need to know.

What time does the Republican debate start?

The third GOP debate takes place on Wednesday, November 8th, at 8 PM ET / 5 PM PT and is expected to last two hours. 

How do I watch the third Republican debate?

NBC News is hosting this debate, and it will air live on the network’s television channel, streaming platforms, and website (NBCNews.com). 

Like the September debate, the Republican National Committee has partnered with the alternative video-sharing platform Rumble, and the debate will be livestreamed from the RNC’s channel. 

Which candidates will be onstage?

Since September, two candidates, North Dakota Governor Doug Burgum and former Vice President Mike Pence, have either dropped out of the race or failed to qualify for today’s debate.

  • Five candidates will be onstage tonight, including:
  • Florida Governor Ron DeSantis
  • Former New Jersey Governor Chris Christie
  • Former South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley
  • Sen. Tim Scott (SC)
  • Entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy

Who is moderating?

NBC’s Lester Holt and Kristen Welker, host of Meet the Press, will be moderating Wednesday’s debate alongside Salem Radio Network host Hugh Hewitt.

Will Donald Trump be at the debate?

Trump is once again skipping Wednesday’s debate and will instead hold a campaign rally in Hialeah, Florida.

]]>
Makena Kelly <![CDATA[Meta to require political advertisers disclose AI-generated content]]> https://www.theverge.com/2023/11/8/23951346/meta-political-ads-ai-artificial-intelligence-advertising 2023-11-08T06:00:00-05:00 2023-11-08T06:00:00-05:00

Meta announced Wednesday that it would require advertisers to disclose when potentially misleading AI-generated or altered content is featured in political, electoral, or social issue ads.

The new rule applies to advertisements on Facebook and Instagram that contain “realistic” images, videos, or audio falsely showing someone doing something they never did or imagining a real event playing out differently than it did in reality. Content depicting realistic-looking fake people or events would also need to be disclosed. The policy is expected to go into effect next year.

“In the New Year, advertisers who run ads about social issues, elections & politics with Meta will have to disclose if image or sound has been created or altered digitally, including with AI, to show real people doing or saying things they haven’t done or said,” Nick Clegg, Meta president of global affairs, said in a Threads post Wednesday.

Content that’s been edited in ways “that are inconsequential or immaterial to the claim, assertion, or issue raised in the ad,” like cropping or color correcting, does not need to be disclosed, according to Meta’s Wednesday blog post. 

For ads containing digitally altered content, Meta says it will flag the information to users and log it in Meta’s ads database. 

Earlier this week, Reuters reported that Meta was banning political campaigns and groups from using its new slate of generative AI advertising products. The tools allow advertisers to create multiple versions of ads, including different backgrounds, text, and image and video sizing.

The decision to disclose AI-generated content in political ads comes as lawmakers and regulators are preparing to take on the issue themselves ahead of the 2024 presidential election. 

Earlier this year, Rep. Yvette Clarke (D-NY) and Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) introduced bills requiring campaigns to disclose when ads include AI-generated content. The Federal Election Commission, the regulatory agency in charge of political advertising, is also expected to make a decision on a new rule requiring political campaigns to disclose the use of AI-generated content. It’s unclear exactly when a vote on this rule could take place. 

]]>
Makena Kelly <![CDATA[Amazon’s secret pricing scheme made it an extra $1 billion, FTC says]]> https://www.theverge.com/2023/11/2/23943724/amazon-project-nessie-algorithm-ftc-antitrust-case 2023-11-02T13:30:48-04:00 2023-11-02T13:30:48-04:00

Amazon’s secret pricing algorithm, codenamed “Project Nessie,” may have generated the company more than $1 billion in extra profits, according to new details released Thursday from the Federal Trade Commission’s antitrust case against the e-commerce giant. 

In September, the FTC and more than a dozen state attorneys general sued Amazon, claiming that the company operates an illegal monopoly. Among other claims, the complaint says that Amazon buried listings offered at lower prices from other retailers and charged sellers steep fees in order to inflate product prices. 

The existence of Project Nessie was first revealed in a previously redacted version of the complaint. Nessie was allegedly an algorithm that would increase the price of products on Amazon and monitor whether other retailers, like Target, would follow suit. If they didn’t, the algorithm would revert the Amazon listing to its original price. 

Amazon reportedly stopped using Nessie in 2019, but the FTC alleges that the company “has repeatedly considered turning it back on.” 

These details were blacked out of the original case and partially reported by The Wall Street Journal. On Thursday, a new version of the lawsuit was released with fewer redactions, providing the public with more insight into the FTC’s arguments and evidence.

“The FTC claims that an old Amazon pricing algorithm called Nessie is an unfair method of competition that led to raised prices for consumers,” Tim Doyle, Amazon spokesman, said in a statement responding to the new Nessie information Thursday. “This grossly mischaracterizes this tool. Nessie was used to try to stop our price matching from resulting in unusual outcomes where prices became so low that they were unsustainable.”

This includes allegations outside of Project Nessie. According to the less-redacted complaint, the FTC alleges that Amazon founder Jeff Bezos directed company executives to accept “junk” ads as a means of extracting “billions of dollars through increased advertising despite worsening its services for customers.” 

Responding to this, Doyle said that the shopping experience of Amazon’s customers is “consistently positive” and pointed to a study claiming that the company’s ads are the most relevant in the world.

The company’s Prime membership program has come under scrutiny by the FTC as well. In the new complaint, the FTC says that Amazon had multiple opportunities to fix flaws in Prime’s signup system “and instead continued to trick more users into signing up” for the service.

Updated November 2nd, 2023 at 2:50PM ET: Added comments from Amazon spokesman Tim Doyle.

]]>
Makena Kelly <![CDATA[Watermarks aren’t the silver bullet for AI misinformation]]> https://www.theverge.com/2023/10/31/23940626/artificial-intelligence-ai-digital-watermarks-biden-executive-order 2023-10-31T14:05:07-04:00 2023-10-31T14:05:07-04:00

President Joe Biden’s executive order on artificial intelligence is a first-of-its-kind action from the government to tackle some of the technology’s greatest challenges — like how to identify if an image is real or fake. 

Among a myriad of other demands, the order, signed Monday, calls for a new set of government-led standards on watermarking AI-generated content. Like watermarks on photographs or paper money, digital watermarks help users distinguish between a real object and a fake one and determine who owns it. 

It’s a seemingly simple solution that has support from the White House and the tech industry. Watermarking technology has promise. But it’s not infallible, and experts fear that it won’t be enough on its own. 

Many of the leading AI companies are already incorporating watermarking tech into their products. Some are simple and easily cropped, like OpenAI’s marking on DALL-E images, but others are more persistent. In August, for instance, Google announced the beta version of SynthID, an imperceptible watermark inserted directly into the pixels of an image. The method avoids degrading or prominently marking the image while allowing AI detection software to authenticate it even after it’s cropped or resized. 

These “high perturbation” methods of embedding digital watermarks into the pixels and metadata of AI-generated content have proven to be some of the most promising answers to harmfully deceptive content. Still, products like SynthID can’t be the only solution. Google itself has said the tech “isn’t foolproof against extreme image manipulations.”

There’s mounting research to back that claim. Earlier this month, researchers at the University of Maryland released a preprint paper explaining the many ways they were able to break all of the watermarking methods available through current technology. Not only was the team able to destroy these watermarks but they were also able to insert fake ones into images as well, creating false positives.

Services like DALL-E and Midjourney have made image generation more accessible than ever before, and the internet has been littered with AI-generated fakes because of it. Some images are mostly harmless, like a viral post of the pope in a Balenciaga puffer jacket. But the war in Israel has shown just how insidious some fakes can be

“This problem is theoretically impossible to be solved reliably.” 

“I don’t believe watermarking the output of the generative models will be a practical solution” to AI disinformation, Soheil Feizi, associate professor of computer science at the University of Maryland, told The Verge on Monday. “This problem is theoretically impossible to be solved reliably.” 

Biden’s executive order also asks the Commerce Department to develop standards for detecting and tracking synthetic content across the web. Adobe announced this month that it had established “an icon of transparency,” or a visual marker to help identify an image’s provenance. The icon can be added to images and videos created in Photoshop, Premiere, and eventually Microsoft’s Bing to show who owns or created the data. In practical terms, when someone hovers their mouse over the tag, it will display information on how an image was produced, like if it’s AI-generated. 

Experts like Sam Gregory, executive director at Witness, a human rights organization, say authenticating AI-generated content at scale will require a “suite of approaches” like these.

“I don’t expect these to work 100 percent. And I do think they’ll be broken, both by malicious actors, but also by accident,” Gregory said. “But we should view them probably in the context of a kind of harm reduction.”

Still, authenticating and tracking AI-generated content presents its own risks. Embedding personally identifiable information into the metadata of images can help content creators take ownership of their products, but it raises new concerns over user privacy. For satirists living under authoritative rule, humorous content challenging their leadership could put them in danger, Gregory said. 

Creating a system of interoperable and reliable image authentication will take time. It’s not yet clear how the order will impact AI companies or what rules the government might impose.

Ahead of the 2024 election, lawmakers and government agencies could play a more central role in mitigating any potentially harmful effects of fakes like the Republican National Committee’s dystopian Biden ad. The Federal Election Commission has been asked to establish a new rule requiring political campaigns and groups to disclose when their ads include AI-generated content. Rep. Yvette Clarke (D-NY) has introduced a bill forcing these groups to do the same.

“It’s always a part of human nature when we deal with a big problem to try to come up with some easy solutions,” Feizi said. “But unfortunately, I don’t believe there is a one-size-fits-all solution here.”

]]>
Makena Kelly <![CDATA[Gaza Strip internet cut off following Israeli airstrikes]]> https://www.theverge.com/2023/10/27/23935229/gaza-israel-internet-outage-connectivity-telecom-blackout 2023-10-27T14:31:02-04:00 2023-10-27T14:31:02-04:00

The Gaza Strip is suffering a near-total connectivity outage as the Israeli Defense Forces announced Friday that it was “expanding ground operations” in the region. 

As of Friday, the connectivity tracker NetBlocks reported “a collapse in connectivity in the Gaza Strip,” with one of the largest and last remaining Palestinian telecom providers, Paltel, being highly impacted by intense airstrikes. Paltel said it had sustained “a complete disruption of all communication and internet services” as a result of the barrage, according to The Washington Post.

Since Israel cut off much of Gaza’s access to electricity earlier this month, the strip has largely relied on other power sources like generators to support connectivity. But in recent days, a bombardment of airstrikes has reportedly destroyed much of the supporting infrastructure. 

On Thursday, service from another large internet provider, NetStream, “collapsed,” according to NetBlocks. The network “notified subscribers that service would end due to a severe shortage of fuel supplies.” The Palestine Red Crescent Society, a humanitarian organization, said Friday that it was “deeply concerned” that it may not be able to provide emergency medical services due to loss of communications services. 

“We have completely lost contact with the operations room in Gaza Strip and all of our teams operating there due to the Israeli authorities cutting off all landline, cellular and internet communications,” the Red Crescent said in a statement on X Friday.

Shortly after Paltel reportedly lost service, an IDF spokesperson said that it was increasing “the bombing in Gaza” and its ground operations. 

]]>
Makena Kelly <![CDATA[Ticketmaster’s still hiding ticket fees, senator says]]> https://www.theverge.com/2023/10/26/23933230/live-nation-ticketmaster-hidden-junk-fees-venue 2023-10-26T10:13:09-04:00 2023-10-26T10:13:09-04:00

Live Nation, the parent company of Ticketmaster, promised to scrap the hidden fees plaguing its ticketing service earlier this year. But one senator says the company’s not doing nearly enough. 

In a letter to Live Nation CEO Michael Rapino Wednesday, Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) called on the company to turn on an “all-in” pricing filter that it added this year by default. Klobuchar said it’s “still too difficult” for users to turn on the filter that’s “buried within a tab that gives no indication that it contains” the option in the first place. 

“Millions of Americans rely on your company for the chance to see their favorite artist, band, or sports team,” Klobuchar wrote. “In return for their business and trust, your customers expect a transparent and honest ticket buying process free from hidden fees.”

“Your customers expect a transparent and honest ticket buying process free from hidden fees”

Back in June, Live Nation, along with AirBnB, SeatGeek, and DICE, pledged to disclose the full price of their tickets and services as part of an agreement with the White House to reduce “junk fees.” At the time, Live Nation said that these new rules would start applying to events in September. 

Responding to Klobuchar’s letter, Live Nation argues that it’s fulfilled its pricing promise. And it says that the agreement only applied to events held at venues Live Nation operates and did not extend to venues the company doesn’t control.

“If we had the power to do that it would have been part of our commitment to the White House and our June 15 announcement,” a Live Nation spokesperson told NBC News Wednesday. “This just underscores the importance of all-in pricing legislation.”

Legislation might be on the way. Earlier this year, Klobuchar introduced the Unlock Ticketing Markets Act, a bill that would empower the Federal Trade Commission with the authority to challenge contracts ticketing platforms enter into with venues. 

“In your own press release, Live Nation-Ticketmaster touted that it will ‘lead the industry with new all-in pricing,’” Klobuchar wrote. “Yet, it is still too difficult for consumers to find the all-in price of a ticket before checkout.”

]]>
Makena Kelly <![CDATA[Apple announces new nationwide right to repair commitment]]> https://www.theverge.com/2023/10/24/23930762/apple-right-to-repair-white-house-iphone 2023-10-24T18:15:31-04:00 2023-10-24T18:15:31-04:00

Apple announced that it would be making all of the parts, tools, and information necessary for consumers and repair shops to fix the device maker’s products during a White House event on Tuesday.

Apple is already required to make these materials available in California after the state passed its Right to Repair Act earlier this month, but the company says it will bring this new support to consumers and independent repair shops nationwide. 

“We intend to honor California’s new repair provisions across the United States,” Brian Naumann, Apple vice president and general manager of the company’s repair business, said during Tuesday’s meeting. “Apple also believes that consumers and businesses would benefit from a national law that balances repairability with product integrity, usability and physical safety.”

“Apple also believes that consumers and businesses would benefit from a national law that balances repairability with product integrity, usability and physical safety.”

Until recently, Apple has fought efforts to support independent repair services by restricting access to the guides and parts necessary to fix the company’s products. But the company has slowly started to embrace the right-to-repair movement (even if its original answer was to ship out 79 pounds of tools). Apple’s gone as far as supporting legislative efforts to codify right-to-repair principles into law. In a surprise move in August, Apple endorsed California’s Right to Repair Act.

Tuesday’s meeting was part of the Biden administration’s broader effort to promote economic competition. In 2021, President Joe Biden signed an executive order urging the Federal Trade Commission to crack down on companies that made consumers jump through hoops to fix their own devices. On Tuesday, the White House called on Congress to pass similar legislation protecting the right to repair. 

“From smartphones to wheelchairs to cars to farm equipment, too often, manufacturers make it difficult to access spare parts manuals and tools necessary to make fixes,” National Economic Council Director Lael Brainard said during Tuesday’s event. “Consumers are compelled to go back to the dealer and pay the dealer’s price, or to discard and replace their device entirely.”

While a handful of states have approved right-to-repair laws in the past, federal efforts have fallen flat. After Biden’s 2021 executive order, Congress picked up the pace, introducing bills promoting the principles for tractor and vehicle repair and holding hearings with experts

The FTC voted unanimously in 2021 to ramp up efforts to go after companies making everything from smartphones and farm equipment to microwaves and cars for limiting accessibility to the materials needed to repair their products. 

Brainard applauded Apple’s move to expand its right-to-repair commitments nationwide, saying, “whether you are in California, Maine or Michigan, Apple will make the parts, tools, and documentation needed to repair your Apple products available to you at reasonable prices.”

]]>
Makena Kelly <![CDATA[Dozens of states sue Meta over youth mental health crisis]]> https://www.theverge.com/2023/10/24/23930408/meta-instagram-facebook-child-safety-lawsuit-states-kosa 2023-10-24T12:20:21-04:00 2023-10-24T12:20:21-04:00

Dozens of states sued Meta on Tuesday, accusing the company of putting profit ahead of the safety of its young users. 

The lawsuit, filed in a California federal court, argues that Meta unlawfully misled the public about the harms its products, like Facebook and Instagram, could impose on children and teens. By implementing a business model meant to maximize time on the platform, Meta contributed to a youth mental health crisis, the complaint says. 

“Over the past decade,” the lawsuit says, “Meta has profoundly altered the psychological and social realities of a generation of young Americans.”

“Meta has profoundly altered the psychological and social realities of a generation of young Americans.”

The complaint alleges that Meta knowingly rolled out features and platform incentives that promote harmful behaviors to young users, including allowing “Likes” on posts and failing to remove content related to disordered eating and bullying.

Meta contested the allegations. “We share the attorneys general’s commitment to providing teens with safe, positive experiences online, and have already introduced more than 30 tools to support teens and their families,” Liza Crenshaw, Meta spokesperson, said in a statement responding to the lawsuit. “We’re disappointed that instead of working productively with companies across the industry to create clear, age-appropriate standards for the many apps teens use, the attorneys general have chosen this path.”

Following leaks from Facebook whistleblower Frances Haugen in 2021, Meta has faced criticism from lawmakers and civil society over how its products impact youth safety. One of these leaks pointed to internal Facebook studies that found Instagram undermined the confidence of young users, and affected users weren’t logging off. The complaint cites Haugen’s leaks as part of its claims against Meta.

“Meta has harnessed powerful and unprecedented technologies to entice, engage, and ultimately ensnare youth and teens,” the complaint says. “It has concealed the ways in which these Platforms exploit and manipulate the most vulnerable consumers: teenagers and children. And it has ignored the sweeping damage these Platforms have caused to the mental and physical health of our nation’s youth.”

Lawmakers, like Sens. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) and Marsha Blackburn (R-TN), have pointed to Meta, its products, and other social platforms as the driving force behind an ongoing youth mental health crisis in the US. The senators introduced the Kids Online Safety Act in response, a bill that intends to protect kids from seeing harmful content online (civil rights experts have raised concerns over the free speech implications of the bill).

]]>
Makena Kelly <![CDATA[Workers training AI demand protections from Congress]]> https://www.theverge.com/2023/10/24/23929411/schumer-ai-insight-forum-marc-andreesen-mturk 2023-10-24T06:00:00-04:00 2023-10-24T06:00:00-04:00

Data workers urged lawmakers to protect their rights ahead of a Senate meeting with artificial intelligence leaders on Tuesday. 

In a letter addressed to Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), workers and civil society groups demanded Congress guard against a “dystopian future” of surveillance and low wages for the people in charge of training AI algorithms.

“The contributions of data workers, often invisible to the public, are critical to advancements in AI,” the letter read. “Congress should develop a new generation of economic policies and labor rights related to prevent corporations like Amazon from leveraging tech-driven worker exploitation into profit and outcompeting rivals by taking the low road.”

The letter was sent ahead of Schumer’s second bipartisan AI Insight Forum. The forums are a series of meetings bringing together tech leaders like Elon Musk and Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg with lawmakers as the Senate considers regulating AI. Over 20 guests were invited to Tuesday’s meeting, including tech investor Marc Andreessen and executives from companies like Stripe and Micron are expected to join the meeting. 

Some advocates are also expected to attend, including NAACP president and CEO Derrick Johnson and AFL-CIO Technology Institute director Amanda Ballantyne, according to CNBC

Turkopticon, a group supporting Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk) workers, signed the Tuesday letter to Schumer. For years, businesses have hired MTurk workers, who often earn far below minimum wage, to help train these algorithms. Tuesday’s letter urged lawmakers to protect the rights of workers like those at MTurk to collective bargaining and to safeguard them from predatory surveillance and management systems. 

“Establishing robust protections related to workplace technology and rebalancing power between workers and employers could reorient the economy and tech innovation toward more equitable and sustainable outcomes,” the letter said. 

]]>
Makena Kelly <![CDATA[FCC kicks off fight to restore net neutrality]]> https://www.theverge.com/2023/10/19/23922810/fcc-net-neutrality-proposed-rulemaking-vote 2023-10-19T11:42:59-04:00 2023-10-19T11:42:59-04:00

After five years in a shallow grave, the FCC has revived the rules meant to force internet service providers (ISPs) like Comcast and Verizon to treat all traffic equally. The agency voted in favor of a notice of proposed rulemaking Thursday, taking its first step toward reinstating net neutrality. 

“Today, there is no expert agency ensuring that the internet is fast, open, and fair. And for everyone, everywhere to enjoy the full benefits of the internet age, internet access needs to be more than just accessible and affordable,” Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel said ahead of Thursday’s vote. “The internet needs to be open.” The notice was supported by Rosenworcel and Democratic commissioners Anna Gomez and Geoffrey Starks; it was opposed by Republican commissioners Brendan Carr and Nathan Simington.

“The internet needs to be open.”

The FCC’s proposal reads similarly to the Obama-era Open Internet Order that the Trump FCC, led by Ajit Pai, repealed in 2017. In order to ban ISPs from blocking and throttling internet traffic, the agency plans to reclassify broadband from an information service to a common carrier under Title II of the Telecommunications Act, imposing stricter rules and oversight reserved for public utilities.

Over the next few months, the public is allowed to make comments on the proposal. Sometime after the commenting period closes, the agency will take a final vote approving the rule.

Since President Joe Biden’s first year in office, the administration has said reimplementing net neutrality was a priority. But the process was delayed time and time again. It took Biden more than nine months to pick a chair and nominate a final Democratic commissioner. Even then, that third Democrat, Gigi Sohn, was forced to withdraw her nomination following a torturous 16-month-long opposition campaign led by Senate Republicans. Until recently, hopes of bringing back net neutrality at a federal level had languished. 

“Repeal of net neutrality put the agency on the wrong side of history.”

But in September, Gomez was confirmed by the Senate as the third Democratic commissioner. Gomez’s confirmation broke the nearly two-year deadlock that prevented the FCC from pursuing any policies that Republican commissioners wouldn’t support. Weeks after the FCC filled out, Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel announced that the agency was finally going to carry out the Biden administration’s open internet agenda. 

“As a result of the previous FCC’s decision to abdicate authority, the agency charged with overseeing communications has limited ability to oversee these indispensable networks and make sure that for every consumer internet access is fast, open, and fair,” Rosenworcel said last month. “I believe this repeal of net neutrality put the agency on the wrong side of history, the wrong side of the law, and the wrong side of the public.”

Net neutrality’s opponents have long argued that the rules would impose outdated and heavy-handed regulations on the telecom industry, which, they say, already provides great service and would never discriminate against certain kinds of internet traffic. “There is no reason to change what is already working well,” House Energy and Commerce Republicans wrote in a letter to Rosenworcel Tuesday. “Adding new regulations through reclassifying broadband is both unnecessary and unlawful.”

But telecom companies have defied the principles of net neutrality in the past. For example, Comcast made BitTorrent barely usable in 2007, and Verizon throttled a fire department’s data during a California wildfire as recently as 2018 after net neutrality was repealed.

Ahead of his dissent Thursday, Republican Commissioner Brendan Carr said, “Reinstating Title II is now an article of faith for many in Washington (and a handy fundraising tool to boot). But make no mistake: any FCC decision to impose Title II on the Internet will be overturned by the courts, by Congress, or by a future FCC.”

]]>