People who make Yule Log videos — are you okay? I’m worried about you. The standard flame-filled videos of holiday cheer seem a lot darker lately, and while I would love to know why, I’m also just generally concerned for your mental well-being.
My first sign that something was wrong was The Witcher: Fireplace on Netflix, which technically came out last year but is understandably getting re-promoted now. It’s got a nice-looking fire crackling away in the Great Hall at Kaer Morhen, but the lightly ominous music lurking in the background killed “the perfect backdrop for a cozy vibe” that Netflix promised.
Then Yellowjackets got in the game on Wednesday with a Yule Log that kept the logs but seems to have missed the Yule. It’s just two hours of creepy vibes and freaky Easter eggs.
I thought I might be imagining things, but SyFy also released a Chucky Yule Log this week. Compared to Yellowjackets, it’s tame, but it’s still Chucky. Something is definitely up this year — apparently, Adult Swim even had a Yule Log-themed horror movie? No way in hell I’m watching that, thank you.
Admittedly, I might be a Yule Log purist. While they’re not exactly scary, weird Yule Logs have been around for a while, and I’ve had ambivalent feelings toward them, too. I don’t particularly want to watch Darth Vader’s suit burn for eight hours, and having Olaf scamper across Disney’s Arendelle castle yule log scene is enough to make me feel a little stabby. Nick Offerman’s 45-minute scotch commercial just makes me want whisky.
Bring on the flames.
So even if I give the creepy Yule Log’s the side-eye, if a scary fireplace brings you some sadistic sense of joy, or helps you cope with the feeling of forced holiday cheer that seems to permeate everything this time of year, then hey, okay, I get it. Sometimes we just want our art to reflect the world, and 2022 hasn’t been universally great. For a lot of people, it’s been pretty shitty. If it helps you get by to have ominous whispers coming out of the speakers while a desolate winter scene hovers on the screen, go for it. You do you.
Personally, I turn on a Yule Log because I want an escape from <waves hands> all this. I don’t have a fireplace in my NYC apartment, so I turn on one of the “Fireplace For Your Home” videos on Netflix while I wrestle gifts into wrapping paper. I’m exactly the kind of person that programmers had in mind when WPIX started the TV Yule Log tradition by broadcasting a three-hour loop of a fireplace in 1966.
I know it’s basic, but the most exciting thing I want to decide if I want the classic or Birch versions. Bring on the flames. I’ll save the scares for another season.
]]>On Mars, another machine just bit the dust. The marsquake-detecting, photo-snapping InSight lander has now officially completed its mission and will now spend its retirement in the same place it spent its career — sitting on a flat plain on the Martian surface, as dust slowly accumulates on its solar panels and other instruments.
We’ve known this was coming for a while. InSight’s solar panels, which generate electricity for the lander, have been getting covered with dust ever since they unfurled. The mission, officially known as the Interior Exploration using Seismic Investigations, Geodesy and Heat Transport (InSight), was expected to run out of power this summer, but a spate of good weather bought it a few additional months of work on Mars.
But that time has run out. NASA has been monitoring the lander’s status, and as it became clear that it wasn’t going to make it, the agency’s first-person first-lander status updates got increasingly emotional. The official Twitter account for the lander told followers in October that it was “staying calm” as a dust storm darkened the skies. Its team thanked fans for sending virtual postcards and assured the millions of people who sent their names along on the rover that “we’re together here on Mars, my forever home.”
The social media team also made sure to explain why the lander didn’t pack dust removal equipment and asked people to remember that there were other machines on Mars before delivering a final gut punch in the form of one last dusty photo from the lander.
December 15th was the last time that the InSight lander communicated with Earth, NASA said in a press release. The agency will keep listening, but after the mission team was unable to contact the lander, they determined that InSight’s batteries were likely drained, leaving it functionally dead.
Its demise caps a mostly successful mission to study the interior of Mars. The lander launched in May 2018 and landed in November of the same year. It was equipped with a seismometer that detected more than 1,000 marsquakes. Most of the marsquakes were relatively small, but at least one, detected earlier this year, was the equivalent of a magnitude 5 earthquake. Scientists are using data from the shaking to get a better picture of the composition of Mars.
While the seismometer was an unqualified success, another instrument on the lander faced troubles. InSight had a “mole” that was designed to hammer itself deep into the surface. Unfortunately, the soil near the landing site wasn’t quite as soft as the team anticipated, and the mole kept popping back out.
Still, the mission was successful enough that NASA decided in April to extend the mission until the end of this year — or until the lander ran out of power, whichever came first.
“We’ve thought of InSight as our friend and colleague on Mars for the past four years, so it’s hard to say goodbye,” said Bruce Banerdt, the mission’s principal investigator, in a press release. “But it has earned its richly deserved retirement.”
]]>At a ‘show and tell’ event on Wednesday, Elon Musk said that his brain-computer interface company, Neuralink, could implant one of its devices in someone’s head within the next six months — meaning it’s not happening this year. He also claimed that he would get the device implanted in his own head at some point in the future.
During the presentation, Musk said that the company had submitted most of the paperwork needed for a human clinical trial to the Food and Drug Administration, which regulates medical devices in the United States. Previously, Musk had said that he’d hoped for human trials to begin in 2020, and then 2022. Now, that’s slipped to at least 2023.
Neuralink’s goal is to create a device that can be implanted in the brain, and use it to control a computer with brain activity. Back in 2019, Musk revealed that the company was testing its device in monkeys. In 2020, it trotted out pigs with the implants. And last year, Neuralink released a video showing a monkey playing Pong with its brain. This year, the monkeys are back. In a video demonstration, one of them helped “type” the phrase ‘welcome to show and tell’ using their implant by focusing on highlighted words and letters. Another video showed how the monkeys were trained to charge the devices by sitting under a wireless charger.
Later in the presentation, Neuralink researchers also showed off a pig on a treadmill, which they said was helping them study how to address mobility issues in people in the future.
The Neuralink devices themselves are small, with multiple flexible “threads” that can be inserted into the brain. “It’s like replacing a piece of your skull with a smartwatch, for lack of a better analogy,” Musk said.
In about 15 minutes, 64 of these “threads” can be implanted into the brain using a robotic system, said DJ Seo, the vice president of Implant and co-founder of Neuralink, during the presentation — while using a mannequin to show how the process might work.
The reason for the robot surgeons comes down to just how tiny those threads are. “Imagine taking a hair from your head and sticking it into jello covered by saran wrap, doing that to a precise depth and precision, and doing that 64 times in a reasonable amount of time,” said Christine Odabashian, the leader of Neuralink’s hardware insertion team.
The company’s demos in 2019 and 2020 were designed as recruitment events, and this one is no different; the company admitted recruiting was its primary goal of the evening. Neuralink is currently looking to fill many different kinds of jobs as it moves from “prototype to product”, Musk said at tonight’s show and tell.
The event was mostly a technical presentation of the device, showcasing how the system was built, challenges the team has faced, how the tech has improved so far, and what developments are coming next. Researchers at the company said they were developing treatments that could either help improve or restore vision, or restore movement in people with paralysis. On the tech side, the company has ambitions to make sure that the device itself can be upgraded easily.
“I’m pretty sure you would not want an iPhone 1 in your head if an iPhone 14 was available,” Musk said.
]]>With a roar that lit up the night sky, NASA sent its colossal next-generation rocket soaring into space for the first time on Wednesday. The Space Launch System rocket, or SLS, took off at 1:47AM ET from Cape Canaveral, Florida, signaling the start of a bold new era for the US government’s space program.
It also marks a major success for NASA’s Artemis program to return to the Moon, which has been plagued by years of delays, development mishaps, and billions of dollars in budget overruns. During the past few months, both hurricanes and technical difficulties caused launch delays — including two scrubs. Then, tonight, engineers managed to fix both an intermittent hydrogen leak and a “bad ethernet switch” in the hours just before launch.
NASA can now put many of those problems in the rearview as it looks ahead to the program’s future.
“For the Artemis generation, this is for you,” said Charlie Blackwell-Thompson, Artemis launch director, as she gave the go-ahead for launch.
The SLS carried its Orion capsule to an altitude of just under 4,000 kilometers before the two craft separated and the core stage of the rocket fell back to Earth, falling into the Pacific Ocean. (The two solid boosters, which separated even earlier, fell back into the Atlantic.) Orion will continue onward to the Moon, which it will orbit for several days before returning to Earth. The capsule is scheduled to splash down in the ocean on December 11th. For this mission, Orion is uncrewed — save for a trio of mannequins, two of which were fitted with sensors to measure radiation levels.
One of the main goals of this flight is to test Orion’s heat shield, which will have to endure temperatures of 2,800 degrees Celsius as it enters Earth’s atmosphere. In addition, NASA will be testing radiation shielding, sensors, navigation, and communications equipment.
The SLS launch was also a test of NASA’s most powerful rocket configuration yet, a prerequisite for future deep space missions. Artemis I, the first integrated flight of SLS and Orion, stands 322 feet — 17 feet taller than the Statue of Liberty — and weighs 5.75 million pounds. During launch and ascent, SLS will produce 8.8 million pounds of maximum thrust, 15 percent more thrust than the Saturn V rocket.
The rocket was originally intended to debut in 2017, but it has consistently been over budget and behind schedule. Government auditors accused NASA of failing to be transparent about cost overruns that have added approximately $1.8 billion to the final budget.
But it was finally ready to launch this year. The first launch attempt on August 29th was scrubbed after Engine No. 3 failed to reach the appropriate temperature to allow for the launch — something that NASA later blamed on a potentially faulty sensor. On September 3rd, NASA made another attempt to launch the rocket but had to scrub again when a persistent hydrogen leak appeared during fueling, defying engineers’ repeated attempts to troubleshoot the issue. Once the leaks got figured out, Hurricanes Ian and Nicole delayed NASA’s launch schedule even further, to November 16th.
This time, the weather cooperated, but hydrogen was still an issue. When an “intermittent” hydrogen leak emerged, NASA sent a crew of three technicians, known as a “Red Crew,” to the launch pad itself. In the shadow of a fully fueled rocket, they had to tighten bolts that could fix the leaky valve on the mobile launcher — the massive platform that holds the giant rocket. They succeeded. Then the Space Force noticed that one of their radar systems needed for the launch wasn’t working properly. Now an ethernet switch needed to be replaced, a process that took more than an hour. Once that was fixed, it was smooth sailing for the mission.
Nearly two hours after launch, the Orion spacecraft officially entered trans-lunar orbit, kicking off the next leg of its 26-day journey. The next flight of the Artemis program, currently set for 2024, will carry a crew of astronauts around the Moon and back without landing. Then, in 2025, NASA plans to launch the first crewed Moon landing since the Apollo 17 mission in 1972. This landing will include the first woman and the first person of color to walk on the Moon.
]]>Okay, space fans. The moment is almost here. NASA is about to launch its next-generation rocket for the first time and send it hurtling out beyond the Moon. It’s going to be a wild time, but honestly, there’s been a lot going on here on Earth, too — and if you’re anything like me, you might be in the market for a quick refresher on what exactly is going down when NASA’s next big thing blasts off.
Consider this your SLS cheat sheet as NASA gears up for its big launch on November 16th.
It stands for Space Launch System.
That seems like a very boring name.
It is. But it is also extremely functional, seeing as it refers to a system for launching things into space.
What kinds of things can SLS launch?
So many things! <slaps rocket> This version of SLS has four big rocket engines and two solid-state boosters and can carry about 27 metric tons up to the general vicinity of the Moon. That’s more than the space shuttle could carry to low earth orbit but less than the Apollo-era Saturn V rocket could carry to the Moon. Future versions of SLS will be able to haul even more.
Whoa, how will it do that?
It’s going to light up like a 5.75 million-pound firework. Those boosters — the twin white cylinders on either side of the rocket — are 17 stories high and are packed with a solid rocket fuel called polybutadiene acrylonitrile. They burn through six tons of this fuel every second, according to NASA. In case you were wondering what this is in relation to jumbo jets, NASA has you covered. Each one “generates more thrust than 14 four-engine jumbo commercial airliners.” The two boosters will generate 75 percent of the boom that gets the rocket and its cargo off the ground.
But that’s only part of the rocket’s power. There’s also the 212-foot-tall core stage — the big orange part of the rocket. On launch day, it will be packed with 537,000 gallons of liquid hydrogen and 196,000 of liquid oxygen, which will fuel the four engines at the bottom.
All of that fuel and engineering translates to a boatload of power. Within 8.5 minutes of launch, SLS and Orion capsule that it’s carrying will be traveling at speeds of around 17,000 miles per hour.
I know, another name. So, SLS will be carrying a spacecraft called Orion. (In pictures, it’s the white part at the top of the rocket.) It is not related in any way to the Orion gaming gadget.
Orion is designed for missions beyond Earth’s orbit, with potential destinations of the Moon or Mars. It’s got an extremely shiny look that will help it cope with extreme temperatures in space, a next-generation heat shield to cope with reentering the atmosphere, and a launch abort system that could blast astronauts to safety if anything went wrong during launch. In space, it can support four people on a mission for 21 days.
Orion flew to space before in a test flight in 2014. It’s been through a lot of testing since then in preparation for this next flight, which has been delayed many, many times. (More on those delays later.) Back in 2020, it looked like there might be a chance that it would get delayed yet again when some engineers discovered a problem with a power component for the spacecraft. Trying to fix it would have taken months, and they have backup systems available, so they will be flying the spacecraft as is.
Nope. There will be three mannequins strapped inside, which look varying degrees of terrifying. One is named Commander Moonikin Campos, and it will wear one of the flight suits that astronauts will wear on future missions. It will be accompanied by the limbless Helga and Zohar, which will carry radiation detectors to figure out how much radiation astronauts might be exposed to during a trip to the Moon. Zohar will be wearing a vest that can protect against radiation. Helga won’t. Good luck, Helga.
One of the big reasons that there won’t be astronauts on board is that this entire launch is one giant test flight. It’s the first time that the SLS is having its big space debut, and putting people on a rocket before seeing if it can actually work feels like an extremely bad choice. (NASA very briefly considered doing exactly that, then decided against it.) Instead, Artemis I will be all about testing how well Orion and SLS work and pushing them to their limits before people get on board.
Oh boy, yet another name! Artemis I is the mission that SLS and Orion are going on. Its primary goal is to make sure that Orion can work in space and that it can deliver astronauts safely back to Earth after the mission is over. As a bonus, it will fly farther from Earth than any spacecraft designed for humans has ever flown before, reaching a distance of 280,000 miles away from Earth.
During the course of its mission, it will travel a grand total of about 1.3 million miles, heading out to the Moon, then entering orbit around the Moon for several days before returning back to Earth. The maps of this mission look like an extremely large and very messy figure eight.
Are there other Artemis missions?
Yep! If all goes well with Artemis I, NASA will move on to Artemis II, which will be the first flight of the SLS / Orion combo with crew on board. It’s also the first crewed mission back to the Moon since the Apollo era, but the astronauts onboard won’t land on the Moon — they’ll just orbit for a while, then return to Earth.
The ultimate goal is for NASA to land the first woman on the Moon during the Artemis III mission, which is still in the works. In August, NASA announced several potential landing sites near the Moon’s South Pole.
Yeah, that’s ringing a bell. How long has this been in the works?
The Artemis program? Since 2019, when then-Vice President Mike Pence announced that NASA was headed back to the Moon and would get there by 2024.
Fun fact! It got its name because in mythology, Artemis is the twin sister of Apollo, and there is just a ton of nostalgia for the Apollo missions, for better or for worse.
So are they going to make it back to the Moon by 2024?
Absolutely not. They’re shooting for 2025 at this point, but that’s still pretty ambitious.
What about the SLS project? I feel like I’ve been hearing about that for longer.
You definitely have. Its origins date back to around 2010 when the US was shifting away from the space shuttle and toward other modes of space transportation. Parts of it started out as a project called Constellation that was canceled for being way too expensive. Then it was revived as SLS in 2010, with the goal of launching in 2017. That slipped to 2018 and kept slipping as the project became notoriously delayed and over budget.
For a full look at the history, check out our story here.
But… they’re ready to go now?
Well, we all hope so. It’s been rough. The dress rehearsal for this launch was cut short in June due to a hydrogen leak, but engineers thought that they’d fixed all last-minute to-dos for the rocket, and NASA decided that it was a go for launch for its first launch attempt on August 29th.
Then, on the day of the launch, NASA engineers couldn’t get one of the rocket’s four engines into the right temperature range, so the launch was ultimately scrubbed. The space agency was “not ready to give up” and hoped to launch on September 3rd. That one got scrubbed, too, thanks to a hydrogen leak. But never fear! The rocket passed a big troubleshooting test at the pad, and NASA penciled in some new launch dates.
Then the hurricanes came.
NASA rolled the rocket back into the Vehicle Assembly Building for safekeeping ahead of Hurricane Ian in late September. It rolled it back out to the launchpad in early November, only to have its planned launch foiled once again by a tropical cyclone, this one named Nicole. It stayed on the pad for that one and weathered the storm with only very minor damage. That brings us to the next launch attempt, currently scheduled for extremely early on November 16th.
What else will be on board?
In addition to Helga, Zohar, and Commander Moonikin Campos, there will be a few other science experiments aboard Artemis I. During the mission, the spacecraft will deploy 10 small satellites called CubeSats. Some will map ice on the lunar surface, one will deploy a giant solar sail and head off to an asteroid, and one will attempt to land on the Moon. On board, there will also be a science experiment that will carry yeast where no yeast has gone before in an attempt to study deep-space radiation.
Also inside the capsule will be a plush sheep named Shaun. Also, Snoopy. Both Shaun and Snoopy will serve as zero-gravity indicators, floating around Orion once it reaches microgravity.
The launch window opens on November 16th at 1:04AM ET. NASA will have a live stream on Monday, with coverage of the launch beginning late Wednesday night.
Update November 15th, 2022, 5:15PM ET: This article has been updated with information about the scrubs, hurricanes, and new launch date.
]]>NASA’s massive Space Launch System (SLS) is almost ready for liftoff after facing multiple setbacks, including two scrubbed launch attempts and two hurricane-caused delays. This highly anticipated rocket launch has been over a decade in the making and marks NASA’s return to crewed missions to the Moon. This mission is called Artemis I, and while there won’t be any astronauts on board during this launch, it will serve as a test for the future goal of putting the first woman and the first person of color on the Moon.
During its first launch, the SLS will catapult NASA’s Orion capsule into space, where it will embark on a voyage around the Moon that is expected to last until December 11th, when it will splash back down into the ocean. On November 4th, NASA rolled the rocket back out to launch pad 39B at the Kennedy Space Center in Florida — a four-mile journey that took nearly nine hours.
Now that the rocket has reached its launch pad and successfully weathered its latest storm, here’s how and when you can watch it lift off into space.
NASA plans on launching the SLS rocket on Wednesday, November 16th, 2022. It will have a two-hour launch window starting at 1:04AM ET. This means the rocket could take off anytime between 1:04AM ET and 3:04AM ET if there are no delays.
If you can’t make it to the launch in person, NASA is livestreaming it from its website, YouTube channel, and NASA app.
There will be a few other ways to follow along on the mission as well. NASA will have a specialized website called the Artemis Real-time Orbit Website (AROW) that will let people track the mission as it happens. You can also get some updates and watch a livestream of the launch from Alexa-enabled devices. Amazon will be flying a version of Alexa on board the mission.
If you’re in Florida or parts of Georgia, you may be able to see the launch if weather conditions are good. People from Savannah to Miami will have just over a minute to spot the rocket as it launches into the night sky.
Update November 15th, 11:08AM ET: Updated to reflect NASA’s new launch time.
]]>NASA’s massive next-generation rocket is facing down yet another tropical weather system, delaying its next launch attempt until November 16th at the earliest.
This rocket was scheduled to finally launch on November 14th, taking off in the dark early morning hours. But with Tropical Storm Nicole approaching the Florida coast, NASA decided to push back the launch attempt. “Adjusting the target launch date will allow the workforce to tend to the needs of their families and homes, and provide sufficient logistical time to get back into launch status following the storm,” a NASA blog post said.
The next launch attempt will take place two days later than originally planned, during a two-hour window that opens at 1:04AM ET. If the rocket doesn’t launch then, there’s another window on November 19th. If successful, it will be the first launch of NASA’s Space Launch System, a huge rocket designed for deep-space travel. This mission is called Artemis I and is an uncrewed mission that will send an Orion spacecraft around the Moon and back, testing out systems that will be needed on future spaceflights, some of which will carry astronauts to the Moon’s surface.
This is the second time that a storm has wrecked launch plans for Artemis I. In September, the approach of Hurricane Ian caused NASA to call off a launch attempt and roll the rocket back into the Vehicle Assembly Building for safekeeping, a process that takes many hours. This time, NASA has elected to leave it on the pad. At the launchpad, the rocket can withstand heavy rain and wind speeds of up to 85 miles per hour.
Nicole is currently a tropical storm and was producing wind speeds of 70 miles per hour at 1PM ET today. It is expected to become a hurricane today and will make landfall in Florida tonight.
]]>When a spacecraft slammed into an asteroid last month, it pushed it closer to its companion and sped up its orbit by about 32 minutes. It’s a huge milestone for the field of planetary defense; it establishes that it may be possible for humans to significantly change the path of a potentially hazardous asteroid — especially if we have warning that one is on the way.
When the Double Asteroid Redirection Test (DART) mission sent a spacecraft crashing into its surface on September 26th, telescopes on Earth and in space were watching the action. Now, initial data from those observatories have shown that DART achieved its goal. Before the impact, the asteroid Dimorphos took about 11 hours and 55 minutes to orbit its much larger companion asteroid, Didymos. The same trip now takes 11 hours and 23 minutes.
Shaving half an hour off of an asteroid’s orbit is a massive win for the mission, which would have categorized even a 73-second change as a success. Researchers think that one of the reasons for the big change in orbit is that the impact displaced tons of material, creating a dramatic-looking plume of debris in the process. This “recoil” gave the impact an extra boost, NASA said.
Is Dimorphos wobbling?
There’s still a lot about the impact that will take scientists time to figure out. They’ll be pouring over many more observations to answer questions like: Is there a new shape to the orbit? Is Dimorphos wobbling? How much debris came off the asteroid when we slammed into it at 14,000 miles per hour?
Once they have that information, the modeling will get even more intense; they’ll take the information from the observatories and run it through physics simulations again and again until they have a pretty good idea of what happened. That way, when the European Space Agency’s Hera spacecraft arrives at the asteroid system in a few years, researchers will have a pretty good idea of what it will find.
“All of this information plays into our understanding of what really happened in the experiment. How effectively did the kinetic impact change the motion of the asteroid? How efficiently was momentum transferred? It’s too soon to say; there’s a lot of moving parts in this calculation,” said Tom Statler, DART program scientist at NASA, during a press conference.
That’s all key information for any future mission to redirect an asteroid heading toward our planet — the basic tenant of planetary defense. Dimorphos and Didymos didn’t pose any threat to Earth, but researchers are on the lookout for other asteroids and near-Earth objects that might be hazardous.
As exciting as these early results from the DART mission are, knowing how to move an asteroid is only part of any future efforts to defend our planet from space rocks. The much larger issue is knowing what hazards are out there — and knowing about them as soon as possible.
“This is a four percent change in the orbital period of Dimorphos around Didymos — and it just gave it a small nudge,” said Nancy Chabot, DART coordination lead at the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory.
A similar “small nudge” to a potentially hazardous asteroid might be enough to keep it out of Earth’s path, but the timing would be vital. “If you wanted to do this in the future, it could potentially work. But you’d want to do it years in advance. Warning time is really key here,” Chabot said.
“The single most important factor that we need to know is which ones out there are potentially dangerous, and when might they be potentially dangerous,” said Lori Glaze, director of NASA’s Planetary Science Division. NASA is working on the Near-Earth Object Surveyor Mission, which would specifically look for these kinds of hazards. The mission, which has faced funding difficulties in the latest congressional budget cycles, is considered a top priority of the planetary science community.
]]>SpaceX and NASA have agreed to figure out whether or not a SpaceX ship could visit and potentially breathe new life into the iconic Hubble Space Telescope. They announced that they were partnering on a study that would look into whether or not that kind of mission was even possible.
The study will take about six months to complete and will involve NASA and SpaceX. It also involves the Polaris Program, a private human spaceflight effort funded by billionaire Jared Isaacman. Earlier this year, Isaacman bought three flights to space on SpaceX’s Dragon spacecraft, a series of missions he’s calling Polaris.
It is not clear yet whether or not a trip to the Hubble would even require a crew
It is not clear yet whether or not a trip to the Hubble would even require a crew, whether SpaceX’s autonomous cargo-carrying Dragon capsules would be better for the job, or whether it’s even possible for a SpaceX vessel to safely visit the telescope. There are a lot of unknowns for this potential mission, which is probably why they’re starting with a study as a first step. The agreement is that NASA and SpaceX will specifically look at the “feasibility of a SpaceX and Polaris Program idea to boost the agency’s Hubble Space Telescope into a higher orbit with the Dragon spacecraft, at no cost to the government,” according to a press release.
Hubble, located in low Earth orbit, has already been visited by spacecraft during its 32-year life. NASA’s Space Shuttle conducted five missions to Hubble to repair the telescope, upgrade its parts, and boost its orbit. Since the last mission in 2009, Hubble’s orbit has slowly degraded as the telescope has brushed against the outer edges of Earth’s atmosphere. It’s now about 30 kilometers closer to Earth than it was in 2009. Boosting the telescope could help extend the observatory’s life.
NASA has no plans to revisit Hubble on its own. Panelists at the study announcement repeatedly emphasized that Hubble is still in good shape. Even without a new mission to Hubble, the observatory is expected to last for several more years. “Thanks to improvements of past servicing missions, we expect Hubble to remain operational until the latter part of this decade, if not into the next,” said Patrick Crouse, Hubble Space Telescope project manager.
Boosting the telescope could help extend the observatory’s life
If the mission is feasible, and if it does get approved, it would give SpaceX a chance to flex its capabilities. Specifically, it would show that it can work on space tech that wasn’t designed with SpaceX in mind.
“SpaceX really sees the future in that we are a spacefaring civilization. And that means that there are spaceships flying all over the place. There’s on-orbit refueling. There’s space stations from various companies,” said Jessica Jensen, vice president of customer operations and integration at SpaceX. “Missions like this, where companies are learning to adapt and figure out ways to talk to older vehicles … I think that’s an amazing capability and that’s how the industry needs to move forward.”
Though Hubble has been somewhat overshadowed lately by the amazing pictures out of NASA’s new James Webb Space Telescope, it continues to produce amazing images of the universe. In March, it spotted the oldest known star, and just this week, it took some incredible views of the DART mission, which sent a spacecraft on a collision course with an asteroid.
“Hubble is amazingly successful. It’s healthy; it’s doing great science as we speak,” said Thomas Zurbuchen, associate administrator for NASA’s Science Mission Directorate. “The data gathered from this study is another tool in humanity’s toolbox that we can use to support future science missions and keep Hubble at the forefront of scientific discovery.”
Correction 10/4/22 6:30PM ET: This story initially misstated the first name of Jared Isaacman, it is Jared, not Jason. We regret the error.
]]>A NASA spacecraft slammed into the surface of a distant asteroid at 7:14PM ET on Monday night, the climax of the agency’s Double Asteroid Redirection Test (DART).
An hour before impact, the target asteroid, Dimorphos, wasn’t even visible in the images from the spacecraft. In some of the early images sent back to Earth, even Dimorphos’ larger companion Didymos, looked like a single speck against a sea of black. The DART spacecraft was moving at 14,000 miles per hour, and details quickly came into view. Viewers on Earth saw the rough surface of Didymos zip by as the spacecraft cruised autonomously towards Dimorphos. Boulders filled the screen just before it went bright red, indicating a loss of signal — DART had reached its final destination.
In the mission operations room, there was wonderment as the images came in. “This asteroid was coming into the field of view for the first time, we really had no idea what to expect. We didn’t really know the shape of the asteroid, but we knew where we’re going to hit.” said Elena Adams, DART Mission Systems Engineer. “So I think all of us were kind of holding our breath. I’m kind of surprised none of us passed out actually, for a second there.“
Telescopes around the world (and a few in space!) are now turning their attention to the scene of the collision. They’ll be watching to see how much the impact changed the movement of Dimorphos. The crash is part of the first practical planetary defense experiment — a trial to see if humanity might one day be able to redirect the path of an asteroid headed toward our planet.
“We’re embarking on a new era of humankind, an era in which we potentially have the capability to protect ourselves from something like a dangerous hazardous asteroid impact. What an amazing thing. We’ve never had that capability before.“ said Lori Glaze, Director of NASA’s Planetary Science Division, soon after the impact.
To be clear, neither Dimorphos nor Didymos, pose any danger to Earth. No known asteroids pose a significant and immediate threat to our planet. But NASA is playing a long game. Someday in the future, if an asteroid is spotted on a dangerous path, the agency wants us to have options that could let us avert catastrophe.
The option that DART is testing is one of the most direct; if we slam something into an asteroid, will it change how that asteroid moves? Because Dimorphos’ orbit takes it between another asteroid (Didymos) and Earth, researchers will soon have an answer to that question.
Dimorphos is relatively small, so scientists couldn’t actually see the asteroid until just before the collision. But telescopes can see Didymos dimming every time that Dimorphos crosses between it and Earth. This lets researchers know how fast the asteroid is moving. They expect to see Dimorphos’ orbit speed up after the collision, but how closely the asteroid’s behavior will match the computer models remains to be seen.
It will likely take a few months to get a full answer of how much the DART mission changed Dimorphos’ orbit, but some images and data will likely start coming out in the next few days and weeks from sources all around the solar system.
Before impact, the DART spacecraft released a smaller satellite, the Italian-built LICIACube. This tiny spacecraft followed DART on its way to its doom, taking pictures of the immediate aftermath, which will be sent back to researchers on Earth. Telescopes on seven continents will also focus on the asteroid system, as will the Lucy spacecraft, the James Webb Space Telescope, and the Hubble space telescope. Then, in 2024, the European Space Agency will send another spacecraft to survey Dimorphos, and get a close-up look at the asteroid and whatever rubble remains of the spacecraft itself.
But in the meantime, the last images from the spacecraft offer a wealth of tantalizing details for researchers, including Carolyn Ernst, a scientist working on DART’s imaging system, DRACO. At a press conference after the impact, she extolled the surprising shapes of the asteroid pair, and the boulders, smooth spots and craters of Didymos, visible for only a brief time.
“These guys, their job is done.” Ernst said, referring to her engineering colleagues, “But ours is just beginning,”
]]>