Representative Debbie Dingell (D-MI) is among the prominent voices in Congress advocating for a smooth transition to electric vehicles. Dingell, who was first elected in 2015, represents suburban Detroit, home to a large swath of the American car industry and the labor force that builds those vehicles.
I spoke with Dingell, a former GM executive who serves on the House Energy and Commerce Committee, about the pressing issues facing legislators as the country races to make EVs dominant.
The interview has been condensed and edited for clarity.
You’ve been supportive of laws that have boosted EV investment in this country. Do you think that our government should have moved faster with these kinds of laws?
It’s a complicated subject. There’s a notice of proposed rulemaking now that would require two-thirds of the vehicles sold in this country be electric vehicles by [2030 or 2032]. Several things have to happen before that’s realistic. I don’t think the foundation is in place.
California, which has been the state that has been the most aggressive in trying to get EVs into their vehicle mix, does not have the charging stations that they need. The ones that they have are not being maintained. What we’re trying to do at the policy level is to give support for the states to build out private-public partnerships for those charging stations, and then they’re going to have to be maintained.
“Several things have to happen before that’s realistic. I don’t think the foundation is in place.”
What we’re investing money in, in the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, the IRA, the Inflation Reduction Act, is to upgrade the power grid as well. That’s an important foundational issue. We’re going to have to become even more aggressive in working with the utility companies.
What can we do to move faster now? These things often don’t move fast.
We’ve got to make these vehicles more affordable. Look, my leases were up on both of my vehicles. In DC, I live in a townhouse. They’re not allowed to have charging stations there. The United States Capitol doesn’t have charging stations. I don’t have the charging availability with the time restraints at my hand. That’s an issue. Do you know how many homes don’t have garages in this country? Fifty percent of the homes in this country don’t have garages. We need to be realistic but keep moving forward.
In what ways are we too dependent on China in the electrical vehicle space now?
Unfortunately, China is starting to build these vehicles. They are the source of probably 80 percent of the minerals that are being used in these batteries. They also own some of the intellectual property. I don’t want to let them get ahead of us, but they probably have a little more know-how. We got to develop that intellectual property here in this country. We put the world on wheels. We are the home of mobility. I am not going to secede our leadership to any other country, let alone China, which [is] one of the reasons we have to be investing in R&D. This is an economic competitive issue, and it’s a national security issue.
“Do you know how many homes don’t have garages in this country?”
What are the stakes between the United States and China in the electrical vehicle race?
We are becoming reliant on China for things not just in the transportation sector but in many areas that we don’t even understand. China is allowed to test their autonomous vehicles on our roads. We are not allowed to go into China and test our vehicles. China’s collecting data right now from those autonomous vehicles about all kinds of things.
Can you help play out the scenario? What if China leads on EV deployment?
We’re going to be exporting our jobs to China. Then they’re going to come back into this country. They’ll sell them at a low price, which is what they do. But then we’re going to be dependent upon them, and they’re going to raise the prices. We’re going to let them take intellectual property that we need in so many different areas. I worked for General Motors for three decades before I came into this job, and we just offshored our supply chain. I told people that Donald Trump was going to become president in 2016 because he understood how the auto workers felt that their jobs had been offshored, that we have become dependent upon a supply chain that’s in other countries and not here. Electric vehicles are an example of a product that we cannot cede our leadership to China on. We have to stay at the forefront of it because transportation is so critical to so many things that we do in this country.
“We’re going to be exporting our jobs to China.”
Let’s talk about Tesla in China. Tesla has benefited by being in China, and Tesla has also helped China’s electric vehicle industry grow.
Tesla is now talking about doing more production out of this country. Tesla doesn’t use union workers. Look, [Elon Musk] developed a good product. He sold many vehicles. I think it was a luxury vehicle that many people could not afford. I think he made electric vehicles more acceptable to many people. I’m just not going to support anybody producing in China. I want to see production here in this country, and I’m going to fight to have products made in this country by American workers and union workers when I can help that succeed.
What do we need to do to invest in public transportation to not make people just solely dependent on owning an automobile as their form of transportation, especially when it comes to equity?
We’re going to be looking at mass transportation more. Autonomous vehicles are going to be one of the ways. I think we need to be looking at rail. We’ve been trying to get high-speed rail just from this area to Chicago for decades. But what is realistic for the heartland? What’s realistic in other places? All options need to be on the table.
“We’re going to be looking at mass transportation more. Autonomous vehicles are going to be one of the ways.”
Do you have the support among your colleagues in Congress?
We’ve got 435 members and probably 435 perspectives. My Republican colleagues, who I respect and work with a great deal just in committee, as we were talking on auto issues before we left for the August break, they don’t like any of this. They do not think we should be moving toward electric vehicles. They don’t think we should be doing mandates, and they have problems, quite frankly, in building out EV or doing public-private partnerships. I have other colleagues that want it today and think it should just get done.
When will we really make this transition to EVs?
I think we’re in it. I don’t know where that end goal is going to be, but I’m not going to stop working at it. Every single day, you get up every day, and you say, “What are the issues? What are the challenges? How do we address it?” And you keep going.
]]>During the development of the Tesla Model S, one top engineer would tick off certain milestones in his mind whenever the tiny, almost bankrupt startup would hit certain goals. A particular number of cars built, for example. And one milestone he distinctly remembers is when the Tesla team completed more than 9,000 cars.
Why? Because that’s all the cars DeLorean ever made before it went out of business. Today, Tesla is rewriting the future more than any DeLorean ever did.
The new season of Vox Media Podcast Network’s award-winning narrative podcast Land of the Giants is debuting next week, and it’s all about Tesla. Tesla has become a giant in the auto industry, dethroning legacy car companies one by one. It is the disruptor of all disruptors in the world of cars, led by a man whose innovations know no bounds — even when many critics say they probably should.
It is the disruptor of all disruptors in the world of cars, led by a man whose innovations know no bounds — even when many critics say they probably should
But it’s not often that story gets recounted directly by those who were working inside Tesla at nearly all levels. That’s what we sought to do here. We are two veteran automotive journalists who have covered Tesla’s unfathomable rise since its early days and are co-hosting this season.
Tamara Warren is the former transportation editor at The Verge who now runs Le Car, a website about cars and culture, and Patrick George, the former editor-in-chief of Jalopnik, is a transportation journalist who contributes to The Verge. Together with our indefatigable producers and editors from the Vox Media Podcast Network, we are mapping out how Tesla went from a niche EV startup to a company that made CEO Elon Musk the richest man in the world — and to see if it can survive what’s coming next.
We’ve talked with expert journalists across Vox Media Network including Pivot hosts Kara Swisher and Scott Galloway, The Verge’s editor-in-chief Nilay Patel, senior writer and Musk expert Liz Lopatto, and transportation editor Andrew Hawkins. We’ve gone deep into Tesla history and spoken to Tesla’s original founders, Martin Eberhard and Marc Tarpenning, as well as former Tesla engineers, executives, and employees, many of whom are speaking on the record for the first time. We’ve turned to journalists, business leaders, and automotive experts like Missy Cummings, Doug DeMuro, and Doug Field to help us understand where the industry is going and explore the real-world realities of driving electric and increasingly automated cars.
It’s wild to remember that Tesla was once spoken of in the same breath as DeLorean or the many other tiny, forgotten upstarts that tried and failed to break into the notoriously difficult automotive business. In about 15 years, Tesla has become the world’s biggest maker of electric vehicles, one of the most ambitious proponents of self-driving cars, and the creator of an EV charging network that is the envy of the entire industry. It’s one of the biggest companies in the world by market capitalization (and by far the biggest car company).
But for every victory, there’s been an equal or greater number of disasters
But for every victory, there’s been an equal or greater number of disasters. Tesla nearly crashed and burned a few times along the way, sometimes through its own unforced errors. It’s made bold promises it hasn’t been able to deliver. It’s faced lawsuits, fines, recalls, and investigations over how it deploys its technology and how it treats its workers.
And as for Musk… you almost certainly have an opinion on him because everyone does. No tech mogul alive today is more known, more controversial, or more ambitious — and he has become inseparable from the Tesla saga, for better or worse.
We’ll explore Tesla’s role in the troubled race toward self-driving cars and the auto industry’s contentious shift to electric vehicles; how Musk’s rise and pratfalls have had ripple effects across the world; and whether the legacy automakers can beat Tesla at its own game.
Vox Media’s Land of the Giants narrative podcast series covers how Big Tech companies impact our lives. Past seasons delved into Meta, dating apps, Amazon, Apple, Google, and food delivery. For decades, car companies were left behind in the tech conversation — until Tesla shifted that perception. We are on the precipice of an industrywide transition to electric vehicles and living in a time when burning fossil fuels contributes to a climate crisis we feel more each day. It couldn’t be a better time to explore the state of the car industry through the lens of a company that altered it.
The first episode of Land of the Giants: The Tesla Shock Wave comes out on July 26th. You can find it on Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts. Listen to the trailer above.
]]>Traffic was abysmal at this year’s Monterey Car Week. Blame it on the 20,000 captive car enthusiasts who descended upon this picturesque peninsula on the California coast 120 miles south of San Francisco to flaunt, ogle, and nerd out over the world’s most expensive cars. The week culminated in a splashy Sunday afternoon cascade of confetti as a prewar 1937 Alfa Romeo 8C won the Pebble Beach Concours d’Elegance best of show, edging out the crowd favorite, a cream-colored 1937 Cadillac.
The sheer size of the audience that visits Monterey Car Week is a reminder that the love for the gasoline-powered, four-wheeled motor car isn’t dead, and there are many well-to-do benefactors intent on preserving its legacy. The official Concours held at the Pebble Beach Lodge, dates back to 1950, when only two dozen cars were shown off. Pebble is steeped in tradition, and the winning cars need to be restored to period-correct perfection.
Pebble is steeped in tradition
What carmakers unveiled during Monterey Car Week had little to do with furthering the legacy of the traditional internal combustion engine. Instead, they teased future concepts that are largely centered on electric powertrains and a growing desire to be perceived as advanced in an industry that’s in transition. It was a testing ground for how their next moves are seen by staunch critics, discerning enthusiasts, and core customers.
Of course, there were plenty of historical automotive activities throughout the week: sister shows at the Quail, the Concorso Italiano, and the more pedestrian Concours d’Lemons catered to cars of less fanciful pedigree. With the exception of the Lemons show, the uncomfortable air of old money and a bull stock market loomed. Auctions drew an estimated $368 million, according to Hagerty, the classic car insurer and financier.
Two obscenely high sales made news on the blocks: $48.4 million for a Ferrari 250 GTO at RM Sotheby’s and a $22 million record-breaking American car sale at the Gooding Auctions of a 1935 Duesenberg SSJ Roadster. In recent years, automakers have tapped into this engaged crowd and made it a hub for new super car sales. And as the car business shifts, so does the type of new vehicles shown across town, an indication of what’s to come.
Marek Reichman, Aston Martin’s design chief, says that he feels there’s room for a balance between present and past. The car enthusiasts tend to be knowledgeable about automotive history and curious about innovation. “We sit close to Silicon Valley. It’s a week that’s all about cars from the earliest days, but it’s also a week that’s about cars for 2025,” he says.
Many luxury car companies brought their senior executives to Monterey for interviews and meetings with dealers. In past years, it seemed that brands merely wanted to show face at Pebble. Now, they’re making some of their biggest announcements at the tail end of summer, ahead of traditional auto season. It’s a sign that interest in the staid convention center shows in Detroit, Los Angeles, and New York may be waning. The Detroit Auto Show will move from frigid January to June in future years, which may stave off further decline in automaker participation. We’ve reported that CES has become a news-driven auto show, but, in many ways, so is Pebble Beach.
Aston Martin transformed a Carmel-by-the-Sea performing arts center into a chic club to show off its cars. The event was open to the public, but it took some personal connections to get up close with the future. Both the Lagonda Vision Concept electric car and Volante Vision Concept, an Aston Martin vertical takeoff and landing concept, were shown on a lit stage. In small groups, executives escorted their best customers and members of the media for an up-close glance. “It’s a learning place for us as a company, and it’s also a place we can actually show how far we are pushing the brand as well,” Reichman says. The setting of Pebble Beach gives his design prospectus unique context. “This is a place where you see things that were successful in the past and things that failed in the past. There’s such a knowledge base here over the week.”
Concept car extravaganzas were held all over town. Infiniti showed off the Prototype 10 at the Quail, an ancillary show of exotic cars held on a Carmel-by-the-Sea property, where sunshine, champagne, and oysters are plentiful. Mercedes-Benz held a grand party at a private home to unveil its new electric concept, the 738-horsepower Silver Arrow EV, a tip of the hat to the 1937 W125 racecar, complete with a touchscreen for video game-like racing. Audi debuted its vicious PB18 trackside, a car that emphasizes the electric power the driver has behind the wheel.
These concepts were transported to the main show at the Pebble Beach Lodge on Sunday morning. The lawn the cars were shown on is located just outside the entrance to the ultimate classic car show, as if the presence of these cars suggested what’s to come. All day on Sunday, a band of people walked around the velvet ropes to get a closer look at the one-off concepts. One product specialist took special care to explain exactly how the engine performance would work on the Genesis Essentia to clusters of curious passersby. The wicked designs were enough to pique the interest of enthusiasts of all ages to stop and gawk.
“My feeling is that we haven’t reached the tipping point, but the tipping point will come”
But even at Pebble Beach, executives I talked to were unsure if the concepts would become something more than a futuristic display.
“It’s hard to say,” Infiniti design director Karim Habib says. “My feeling is that we haven’t reached the tipping point, but the tipping point will come.” He cited Tesla’s influence and his parent company Nissan for creating the Leaf as a mass product. “We know we can do it, and we can do a compelling product. Does the market want it? I would say, personally, it’s just a matter of time. It’s really fun to drive these cars.”
But other people weren’t convinced that the world is ready for the electric car to take over. I met Gregory Erker and his wife as they checked out the Mercedes-Benz concept car. Erker described himself as car lover but not a collector. The couple said they drove down from San Francisco to check out the classics and watch the people whose Pebble Beach costumes are often as interesting as the rare cars.
“I think electric cars seem like the next wave of the future,” Erker says. “I don’t know how the infrastructure is all going to work out with electric cars, so right now, I’m not quite enamored with them. But maybe someday, when they become more popular and easy to juice up.”
Pebble Beach may be the perfect place to imagine a utopian, electric future. The cars are gorgeous, and the amount of capital the ultra rich throw around like Monopoly money is unbelievable. “Beauty is one thing, but it seems like the more beautiful it is, the pricier it is,” Erker says. “I think, for most people, it’s gorgeous and more power to you if you are able to own and maintain them. They are great to look at, but the question is: how practical are they for most people?”
One trend that automakers avoided at Pebble Beach was hyping up their autonomous driving strategies. This segment of enthusiasts is not ready to give up the keys. And so in this bucolic setting, the self-driving revolution seems far off.
But, still, we know it’s coming.
Perhaps one day, Pebble Beach will be one of the only places left where classic cars use gasoline and are driven by people. After all, before the car took over, the horse and buggy dominated. Horses may not drive on public roads much these days, but there are still plenty of people who like to gather for the purpose of admiration and remember the way we were. If the car goes the way of the horse, prices for rare collector cars at Pebble Beach may continue to rise.
Photography by Tamara Warren for The Verge
]]>Infiniti’s new Concept 10 dips into the automotive greatest hits playbook. The single-seater sports car concept teases the way Infiniti will address electric luxury in our not-so-distant future. Introduced Friday during Monterey Car Week, where international car collectors gather to fawn over beloved classics, Infiniti is making a statement as it maps out its trajectory for new electric models set to debut in 2021.
While Infiniti didn’t even exist in the in the 1960s, the cars from that era have left an impression on its contemporary designers. A look at the angled hood and sloping rear conjures up a 1960s era Alfa Romeo Spider Duetto, a car with a cult following. And then there are cues to the racing scene, where modifications were a symbol of the DIY inspiration celebrated by the grassroots motorsports that thrived in southern California.
It’s a sunny, optimistic vision
I see Star Trek on the asymmetrical tonneau cover that’s more of an abstract sculpture than a practical element. There’s nothing practical there — this concept is all about being dreamy. It’s a sunny, optimistic vision, in a car that confidently positions its driver out in the open air.
It’s the first complete vision shown by the Infiniti studios since Karim Habib, formerly of BMW, took the reigns as chief designer one year ago.
“Here it was important to us that we take a concept that we know is a compelling, fun thing and you take that and interpret that for future,” Habibs said in an interview with The Verge. “The forms are a preview of we want to do. We want to have these to be very much more composed, much more restrained than what you see today, but we want it to be just as expressive. To be honest if we are able to do that, it’s what I’ve always tried to do in my career even as a student.”
The project was finished in only four months, an incredibly short time by traditional automotive industry standards. An international team of designers in studios based in the UK, Japan, and the US worked on the Concept 10. “To be honest, that’s why we are able to manage it. We were probably working 24 hours in the studio,” he says. Habib, who’s based in Japan, would check in with his London design team on the way home from work, with a directive. “And then I’d come back in the morning and it was done. The alliance as a whole is really well set for working around the globe.”
Infiniti wants to keep speed and joy in its purview
It’s clear that Infiniti wants to keep speed and joy in its purview as it moves toward introducing its first production electric vehicles in 2021. And Habib is also looking deeper with the company’s own design DNA. He points to Nissan’s own willingness to take chances on new forms . “Nissan and Infiniti have a unique history. You think about the VC Turbo, the FX45 was the first coupe like SUV, to have extreme proportions and a lean body.”
For Habib though his team is international, he’s found relevance in the roots of the Japanese brand. He is reticent to articulate the design language on exactly how you define an Infiniti car, but he knows when he feels it. “One thing that’s been so great for me personally, the whole width of new design, architecture, art, and typography that I see in Japan has changed my way of seeing it. We don’t want any of it to be cliche, but you have to feel it.”
“We don’t want any of it to be cliche, but you have to feel it.”
It’s likely that the whimsical nature of the design briefly contributed to the pace of productivity. If you talk to enough car designers, most will tell you that they began drawing cars before they could read, and these were the cars they imagined: sinewy, coupe shapes that oozed form and fluidity. It was a theme designers also explored in the Infiniti Prototype 9, shown last year, which took homage from an earlier era in motorsports. “Last year we did the P9, inspired by race cars of the 30s. We wanted to keep that idea to have a relevance at Pebble Beach. Yes, we’re going to be electric, but we want to have fun. We want the act of driving an electric car to be pleasant. What better than a race car to do that, to show that idea.”
It’s not a rational or responsible desire to dream of expensive looking sports cars. But still, the 20th century image of a curvaceous four-wheeled form continues to foster a culture of envy. The high price tag attached to these cars that made them a symbol of aspiration, greed, and everything in between, has endured, as the performance numbers and prices on supercar reach astronomical seven-figure levels. What has been lacking in the rare European supercar category are cars powered by electric powertrains. But the days of the rude gasoline-inhaling performance car may be dwindling.
Pininfarina is the newest Italiana brand to attach itself to the fast-growing list of luxury EV makers, but among the cult of Ferrari enthusiasts, Pininfarina is already a big deal. On Thursday, Automobil Pininfarina, a spinoff of the 90-year-old design house, unveiled teaser images of the PFO, its planned first-ever production car, a 250 mph battery powered hyper car.
“As a super sports car brand, no one has embarked fully on an EV strategy”
In an interview with The Verge, Automobili Pininfarina CEO Michael Perschke says the PFO will have a range of 300 miles on a single charge. “As a super sports car brand, no one has embarked fully on an EV strategy.” He estimates that it will take 10 to 15 minutes to charge the battery up to 80 percent. The performance numbers are dizzying — it will fly from 0 to 60 miles per hour in under two seconds.
Those images of the PFO show a curvaceous, sculptural exterior two-seater carbon fiber form encased in sweeping glass. A single ribbon of light cascades from the headlights across the front end. It’s message is clear — it’s an object of beauty that screams speed. Translation: it’s a truly Italian sports car. It’s the latest smoke signal that the electric future is nigh, pairing screensaver-worthy cars with a Tesla-blazing powertrain, and perhaps eventually spelling the end for gasoline. In January, Ferrari revealed plans to make an electric supercar. These announcements follow on the heels of the reveals of the Porsche Mission E concept and the BMW i8 roadster, and McLaren’s intentions to spend $2.1 billion on electrification.
It’s the latest smoke signal that the electric future is nigh
For a couple hundred potential well-to-do customers that can’t resist this latest sub $2 million dollar proposition, the PFO will be unveiled as a concept car at the 2019 Geneva Motor Show and be delivered in the second half of 2020. The company will start taking orders later this summer when it shows a prototype to select groups at Monterey Car Week where some of the world’s most expensive cars are auctioned, flaunted, and fawned over.
Pininfarina is in its element at Pebble Beach. The prize-winning 1936 Lancia Astura Cabriolet, once owned by Eric Clapton, won top honors at the Pebble Beach Concours D’elegance in 2016. The iconic Turin, Italy based coach builder is responsible for the aesthetic of the world’s most collected cars including the Ferrari Testarossa, as seen in the SEGA game Outrun. Pininfarina namesake and founder Battista Farina was nicknamed Pinin, local dialect for a short guy, the lead designer told me. Farina found a kindred stubborn spirit in the engineer Enzo Ferrari when they first met in 1930. The Pininfarina house also built custom cars for Alfa Romeo, Maserati and Cadillac and has a list of over 1000 cars in its books. More recently, its design arm has been hinting at alternative powertrains. It showed the Nido EV concept in 2010 and the H2 Speed concept, a hydrogen powered raced car in 2016. Its list of star clients includes Jackie Kennedy and the Sultan of Brunei.
The value in that star-studded legacy inspired its current ownership, the Indian-based Mahindra Group, to double down on its historic pedigree and move the name badge of Pininfarina from the side of the car to the front hood of an electric supercar by founding the official Automobiliti brand. Mahindra is one of the driving forces on the Formula E circuit, which holds its New York race this weekend, and is well versed in EV production. The venture was first announced in April. This week, Automobili Pininfarina says that Formula One and Formula E racer Nick Heidfeld will join the as development driver next year as part of its growing leadership team.
But this classic brand isn’t approaching technology as an afterthought. It hopes to strike a note with potential customers in Silicon Valley. “We assume that we appeal to customers like a Larry Ellison or Marc Benioff, who also have an affinity to sustainability and see technology as an advancement to get to the next level,” Perschke says.
Part of its business plan is to seek out partnerships with tech companies to own the hardware inside of the vehicle. “We will not have large department. We’d rather talk to others like Apple, Google, and Salesforce who are into technology, and integrate them rather than do our own systems. OEMs are still defending infotainment architecture. I’m happy to full integrate an iPhone. But do you need to sell infotainment system at a surplus of another $5000?” he says.
“We assume that we appeal to customers like a Larry Ellison or Marc Benioff”
The design arm of Pininfarina counts Volvo as one of its past clients, an automaker using a more contemporary approach to its in-car technology. “If you try to be a software company as a car company, per definition, you will always be second,” Pershcke says. “You’re gaining a lot of accessibility and speed in open source systems.The apps are what clients are really interested in.” It’s a very different approach than a car with a similar price tag and mind-numbing performance, the Bugatti Chiron.
But in order to persuade customers to splurge on a two seater performance car, it has to live up to its exclusive reputation, rooted in awe-inspiring form. Pininfarina has credence as the ultimate art car. The Pininfarina-designed Cisitalia 202 was the first car included in the Museum of Modern Art’s permanent collection.
Design Director Luca Borgogno says that building beauty is paramount instead of sticking to the design adage of form following function. “We want to make a car that is not overdesigned. We want something that is super clean and impossibly simple.” As it is primed to grow, the 10 person design team is borrowing members from Pininfarina SpA, the company’s traditional design house. That branch of the company recently showed another high end transportation project: the Princess R35 Performance Sports Yacht.
Pininfarina plans to incorporate sustainability into its design appeal, modeling itself after Stella McCartney’s approach to materials in her high-end fashion brand. That vision includes materials that have been ethically sourced, natural woods, and paints without chemical ingredients. “The constraints are there, what is good is we live in the moment we can work a lot between human and machine. We want to make a big statement as well,” says Borgogno.
“We want to make a big statement as well”
To build its cars, Perschke says it will share a factory with a few EV companies, suppliers, and assembly partners. Other vehicles are planned to follow the PFO, and the company will investigate hydrogen-powered vehicles, as referenced in the H2 concept. It’s also working on plans to repurpose its batteries. “For future cars we want a second life strategy,” Perschke says. “In 2023 to 2025 we will be perceived as a sustainable luxury brand.”
To make it to the next car, first, the over-the-top PFO needs to capture the hearts of discerning customers. If they are successful, it may be a sign the culture associated with unapologetic gas guzzling engines is dwindling, an impact that could ripple into more affordable spaces as battery technology and lightweight materials become more affordable. But at this level, the ridiculous price tag is part of what makes the car so appealing to the high-rolling car collectors.
]]>Yesterday, Ford Motor Company announced its long-rumored plan to buy the abandoned Michigan Central Station and restore it as hub for its future mobility ventures. The news quickly created a sense of awe across metro Detroit.
For decades, the dilapidated presence of the once majestic train station stung residents as an ominous reminder of widespread neglect. The 18-story building towers over Michigan Avenue, and while it made for a lucrative set piece on the film Batman v Superman, it represents a deep, complex wound. It is a physical reminder of what the city was, and what it many thought it would never be again.
It’s a punchline, a romanticized and ruined tourist destination, and a divisive, unavoidable barrier between the Southwest and Corktown neighborhoods. But all that may soon change.
Ford’s purchase of the station is a grand, symbolic gesture that seemed unlikely only a few years ago. As its intention materializes to transform the station into a center for autonomous driving and innovation in the next three to four years, it’s a poignant move that resonates deeply in the city and around the state of Michigan. It’s what prompted a thief (née collector) that “acquired” the station’s original antique clock to return it last week.
On Tuesday morning, Ford laid out the details and made the purchase official in a public ceremony. The occasion was festive as the automaker threw a giant party ahead of the speeches and invited performers such as the hometown artist Big Sean to the stage, as its leadership presented the scope of its vision.
About 2,500 company employees, the majority from its mobility team, will work in the renovated building and surrounding area where Ford has bought additional land and properties, including the Detroit Public Schools Book Depository and a former factory. Projects will range from parking experiments to public transit projects — a once unthinkable business move for a company that subsists on the profits of its trucks and SUVs. Imagine a train that shuttles workers between Ford campuses in Ann Arbor, Dearborn, and Detroit.
“Michigan Central sits at one end of a prime corridor for autonomous vehicle development,” says Michelle Krebs, a senior analyst from Autotrader. “Michigan Avenue connects to Ford’s worldwide headquarters in Dearborn, to the American Center for Mobility, which vows to be the nation’s, if not the world’s, largest, most comprehensive autonomous vehicle testing and validation center. Beyond the ACM is Mcity, an autonomous vehicle testing center already in operation, and then the University of Michigan, where Ford has a robotics center on campus.”
The space will also house an additional 2,500 workers in related businesses. No specifics were given on which businesses would move there, but Ford has supported Techstars Mobility, which is based in Detroit and is one potential source for startup tenants. The remainder of the space will house retail, community areas, and residential housing. The auto giant says it will restore the grand lobby, the station’s staple space, for public use. It’s an ambitious endeavor and in doing so, Ford makes a formidable commitment to tie its future to the city of Detroit, steeped in the company’s indelible relationship with its history.
In an interview with The Verge, Ford chairman Bill Ford said he was touched by the multigenerational crowd that turned up at Tuesday’s ceremony. He recalled how his grandmother traveled from the station by train to New York City. And he expressed his personal frustration with its disrepair. “As somebody from this area, for years when I traveled, I would see this station as the poster child for the decay of Detroit.”
“I would see this station as the poster child for the decay of Detroit”
But now that version of a fading Detroit is starting to seem outdated. Over the past several years, a narrative of transformation has overtaken the city. Ford began to see the possibilities in a lucrative urban environment that aligned with the company’s vision to become more than a carmaker. When he first imagined the feel of a restored station, Bill Ford drew inspiration from San Francisco, a source for coveted talent. “The Ferry Station in San Francisco is the template in my head,” he says. If the gamble pays off, locals as well as top talent from Silicon Valley will see Detroit as a viable and inviting city to work and live in. “The tech companies don’t have anything like this building,” he says.
In order to keep pace with the industry, Ford needs to draw in outside talent, says Krebs. “The kind of talent Ford needs in the future is the same kind of talent that not only its auto-making competitors are going after, but also every other industry. Software engineers, data scientists, electrical engineers are in high demand not only in the auto industry but virtually every other industry. In addition to all of the other aspects of hiring, Ford must create a work environment in a location that is attractive to young workers who prefer to be in a hip urban area to cubicles in the suburbs.”
Detroit’s comeback story is part of its appeal to newcomers. It began to take hold after the city’s economic situation hit rock bottom preceding bankruptcy in 2013. As word got out about cheap real estate, people from all over the world have been moving to Detroit, buying up properties. (See Curbed Detroit for the eye candy.) That interest began to build the narrative of makers and doers coming to Detroit to launch businesses.
Detroit’s comeback story is part of its appeal to newcomers
But to date, much of its makeover has been in pockets. Corktown has been one of these pockets, where restaurants and boutiques have opened in the past several years, anchored by cobblestone streets on Michigan Avenue. It’s easy to see the appeal of Corktown, the oldest Detroit neighborhood. It was originally settled by Irish immigrants, from County Cork, a point that Bill Ford emphasized to me. (He regularly visits County Cork in Ireland, where the Ford family has its roots.) A few miles from Corktown, his great grandfather Henry Ford ushered in the first moving automobile assembly line in 1913. Michigan Central Station opened that same year. The rise of Detroit, the metropolis, throughout the 20th century mirrored the economic success of the thriving local car industry.
But as the auto industry began to slowly decline in the 1960s and ‘70s, car company companies shifted away from being a driving force for the city. Painful politics of racial divide, white flight, inequity, and lack of investment became Detroit’s public dominant narrative, no longer its vehicles. In 1988, the year the train station closed, both Ford and General Motors posted record profits. The long term effects of Detroit’s struggle has not helped the image of the local car industry.
Detroit is still a long way away from a thriving city. Its school system is underfunded and abandoned properties are rife. It’s never regained the population it lost when it was a city of over a million people in the early 1990s. Its comeback is predicated on further growth and it has yet to attract another major employer to relocate downtown. The state unemployment rate has declined, but in December the rate was 8.7 percent in Detroit according to an NPR report. That’s why Ford’s move to double down on Detroit is stirring. It’s not a sure bet, but it’s a hopeful vote of confidence. Much of the particulars still need to be determined and the company plans on tapping into the community for ideas.
Ford also has to contend with its crosstown neighbor General Motors that maintains its world headquarters in downtown Detroit. And Ford is not going at Detroit nor autonomous driving alone. Ford is a long way from catching Waymo’s self driving test efforts. But competition in this sports-minded town has always been a motivator, and Ford has now upped the stakes. “There were 1,800 car companies when my great grandfather launched Ford in Detroit,” Ford says.
If there’s a lesson to be learned from the past, it’s about reconciling and finding the thing that makes you unique. “It’s the most compelling blend of old and new,” Ford says. “It’s taking one of the most beautiful spaces in the city. It’s imbuing people with the history. But it’s taking the history and saying, ‘now let’s reinvent the future.’”
What’s most thrilling about Ford’s move, whether or not it succeeds in changing Detroit’s future and securing its position as the tech company it aspires to be, the company has made a definitive statement. The truth is no one knows exactly who will be the last players standing in the race toward the future and winning the race to autonomy. As Bill Ford says, “One thing about renovation, you don’t know what you’re going to find.”
]]>We were never supposed to want the Mercedes-Benz G-Class, but we do. How can we resist its talents? On a recent trip to southern Europe, I drove it on its side, hovering on two wheels at one point as I dangled above a steep incline. Gravel spit, rocks flew from my wheels, and my adrenaline rushed. I am happy to report that I didn’t flip the vehicle on this precarious adventure.
I am happy to report that I didn’t flip the vehicle
Mercedes is betting that the well-to-do will continue to prefer these mini luxury tanks for the foreseeable future, even if most of its customers will buy into the idea of its powers rather than executing its moves in reality. We saw the G-Wagen, as it’s also known, make its swaggering entrance at the North American International Auto Show in January.
This fall, two redesigned models will go on sale: the G550 and even more powerful G63 AMG. Mercedes found a way to revive its old-school essence, and it doubled down on making a more complex, practical, and technically savvy ride.
I spent a few days tooling around southern Europe in the production G-Class this spring to get a sense of how past and present converge. I began in Languedoc-Roussillon deep in the French countryside and wound my way west into the Pyrenees Mountains that serve as the natural border between Spain and France, named for the Greek mythological princess Pyrene, the lover of Heracles. I passed quaint cottages nestled in the valley and forlorn hitchhikers who stared me down. (It was an uncomfortable reminder of what it means to flaunt a six-figure super vehicle.)
Was is it my imagination, or did the G-Class receive a few low-level whistles when I drove down cobblestone streets through misty Catalonian towns over the Spanish border? I ended up in the bustling Barcelona city center, a few blocks from where Mobile World Congress is held, blasting me from mythology back into the modern day.
Though the G-Class preserves its classic looks, it feels modern inside. Climbing up into the cabin of G-Wagen is an emboldening experience. It has always required a hoist of the body and is not for the out-of-shape or petite. Mercedes has made its interior changes overt.
did the G receive a few low-level whistles when I drove down cobblestone streets?
A few staple cues have been modernized, like round air vents that mirror the front headlights and a grab-bar in front of the passenger seat that’s made from a substantial wood. It also added comfy seats with the option for a body-hugging massage. It has several USB ports, and a slick Burmester sound system. It shed its campy, rugged feel for a high-gloss treatment that includes an option for a slick digital dual-screen, similar to other new Mercedes models, and it uses the Mercedes-branded Comand infotainment system. The screen layout is adaptable in three different views — classic, sport, and progressive — which tells you a lot about how Mercedes thinks about the people who drive this vehicle.
The biggest issue with the horizontal wide-screen panel is its placement on the dash. The steering wheel blocks much of the wide-screen view, where Comand functions are housed. I found myself ducking in search of information. And no matter how I positioned the wheel, I couldn’t find a clear line of sight. It’s a problem dictated by the G’s inherent proportions.
To maneuver around this system, there’s a choice between thumb-clicking the pads on the side of the wheel or using the touchpad above the arm rest that’s wired with “haptic impulses.” The electrical functions change the screen setting as you hover your hand over the joystick. When the car was in park, I leaned directly over the console to take photos and promptly confused the system as it started scrolling through screen options at a delirious rate. The purpose of this setup is to prevent the driver from looking down while driving. And while it’s the right move to prevent distraction, it could use further refinement on execution. There’s a sense of disconnect in this process. Using this system is never quite intuitive. A heads-up display seems like it would be more useful, especially in off-roading mode. An in-car hologram would be even better.
In lieu of the massive screen, there’s also an option for traditional gauges paired with the 12.3-inch screen that’s housed in the center console. What the G-Wagen lacks so far is the new MBUX system. (Mercedes designers told me there wasn’t time to incorporate it.) The rollout of MBUX, which The Verge tested at CES, debuts in the A-Class and the Sprinter van this summer. When it eventually makes its way to G-Wagen, it will be interesting to see how this improved system changes the way the driver interacts with a car that sits high up and is equipped to do so much more than cruise.
The most noticeable shift in the G-Wagen is the way it drives. Mercedes changed the internal architecture and added new front suspension with an independent double wishbone front axle that works in tandem with its rear. This engineering move is a performance game-changer, and it makes the G-Class a much smoother handler.
During my excursion, I gave the G-Class a whirl in the backcountry. I drove it up sharp hills that made my stomach turn. I maneuvered the vehicle to hug along a narrow shoulder and ignored my fear of heights and the sharp drop at my side. Somewhere in this stretch, I maneuvered onto two wheels, aided by a few subtle cues from a co-driver. Back down in the valley, I coasted through a spring filled with high, muddy waters that licked at my windows. To accomplish these feats, three differential locks positioned on the center console— full front, center, and rear differential — adapt to the way the vehicle tackles its task.
I drove it up sharp hills that made my stomach turn
Part of the reason I was able to execute these risky moves is the additional “G-Mode,” a system that adjusts the way the vehicle responds to steering, gear changes, and acceleration. It makes you feel like a better off-road driver than you are when you take on the rough landscape. In G-Mode, you can alter the screen to get more information about what’s happening outside of the car, including a 360-degree camera that allows you to see beyond the sightline of the wheel. I even backed up a steep incline that made me dizzy. Most drivers will never attempt this foolishness, but bragging rights are part of G’s backstory. It doesn’t just look like an army toy; it behaves like an all-terrain Star Wars vehicle sidekick.
On the exterior, its proportions, square physique, and substantial size make it instantly identifiable (though most of those have been altered slightly). It’s both longer and wider. Only a handful of design cues remain from recent model years, including the door handles, spare tire cover, and part of the headlights. Aluminum is used on the side panels, which lightens up the overall weight and improves efficiency.
The biggest difference between the G550 and the G63 models are performance bragging rights. The G63 has a bigger engine, which produces 577 horsepower, bigger wheels, and AMG badging as part of its offering. What all the Gs lack, of course, is a cap on the use of petrol. To maintain its classic form, it relinquishes aerodynamics, and all that power, so far, doesn’t translate to a comparable electric powertrain. But since the average G-Class driver owns several other cars, they can balance out their carbon footprint with something more fuel-conscious, if they so choose.
Who drives the funky G-Wagen? It’s still an anomaly to see one on the road, which is part of its decadent fun. It takes considerable cash to play in this field. Pricing hasn’t been announced, but it’s likely to start around at least $125,000 for the G550 and in the $150,000 range for the G63 AMG.
G-Wagen’s ascent to showy American status symbol was a fluke
From the beginning, G-Wagen’s ascent to a showy American status symbol was a fluke. In the mid-1970s, the Shah of Iran was among those that spurred its development process, and preordered a small fleet. By the time partners Steyr, Daimler, and Puch brought the first Geländewagen to market in 1979, the Shah was no longer in power. G became the iconic Popemobile of choice in 1980. It has always been boxy and brash but also beguiling. Early models featured chunky plaid seats intended for both military and agricultural purposes, and it only made 71 horsepower.
G-Wagens were made into firetrucks and ambulances. There was even a convertible model still coveted by car collectors. Its distinction drove demand, and soon, third-party importers brought the G-Wagen Stateside. It grew into the ultimate symbol for bling when it was officially introduced to the US market in 2003 as the G-Class in official Mercedes-Benz lineup. It became a movie star, ubiquitous with badass, featured in Die Hard, Jurassic World, and The Bourne Supremacy. The G-Wagen was the leading figure throughout the stars and cars era, as demonstrated through the lens of Kardashian GoPros, and more recently, on Logan Paul’s YouTube channel.
But driving the G as an everyday car had its cons. It was so loud that you could barely have a conversation; it had heavy, awkward doors that were hard to shut; and its rigid, rickety handling was unforgiving on public roads. The interior felt downright dated, in a not-cool way that bordered on tacky tech, and the high-backed seats could be punishing on long excursions. With this model, that legacy could be left in the past.
It’s clear from all of the careful changes that Mercedes is recasting the new G as a more viable super-fancy SUV. The timing for this vision appears to be right. SUVs have locked down the markets as the go-to choice for most buyers. Ford, excluding the Mustang and upcoming Focus, will cease production on passenger cars. But the question is: do we have our version of the future all wrong? The G-Wagen might not sell as well as the more compact GLE made by Mercedes, but that’s because the G-Wagen is meant to stay exclusive. It’s not for everyone because of the cost and the sheer audacity it takes to helm such a statement-maker. But what it does do is instill desire. People still do love sitting up high in their SUVs and packing in extra storage options. Perhaps the self-driving future will be led — or inspired — by big, badass-looking toy think tanks.
If not, at least in the present moment for both stylists and survivalists, the G-Wagen makes its case for storming the streets with swagger.
]]>Food, water, and shelter are basic human needs, but 1.2 billion people in the world live without adequate housing, according to a report by the World Resources Institute’s Ross Center for Sustainable Cities. Today at SXSW, an Austin-based startup will unveil its approach to combat that deficiency by using low-cost 3D printing as a potential solution.
ICON has developed a method for printing a single-story 650-square-foot house out of cement in only 12 to 24 hours, a fraction of the time it takes for new construction. If all goes according to plan, a community made up of about 100 homes will be constructed for residents in El Salvador next year. The company has partnered with New Story, a nonprofit that is vested in international housing solutions. “We have been building homes for communities in Haiti, El Salvador, and Bolivia,” Alexandria Lafci, co-founder of New Story, tells The Verge.
The first model, scheduled to be unveiled in Austin today, is a step toward providing shelter to those in underserved communities. Jason Ballard, one of ICON’s three founders, says he is going to trial the model as an office to test out their practical use. “We are going to install air quality monitors. How does it look, and how does it smell?” Ballard also runs Treehouse, a company that focuses on sustainable home upgrades.
Using the Vulcan printer, ICON can print an entire home for $10,000 and plans to bring costs down to $4,000 per house. “It’s much cheaper than the typical American home,” Ballard says. It’s capable of printing a home that’s 800 square feet, a significantly bigger structure than properties pushed by the tiny home movement, which top out at about 400 square feet. In contrast, the average New York apartment is about 866 square feet.
The model has a living room, bedroom, bathroom, and a curved porch. “There are a few other companies that have printed homes and structures,” Ballard says. “But they are printed in a warehouse, or they look like Yoda huts. For this venture to succeed, they have to be the best houses.” The use of cement as a common material will help normalize the process for potential tenants that question the sturdiness of the structure. “I think if we were printing in plastic we would encounter some issues.”
Once ICON completes material testing and tweaking of the design, the company will move the Vulcan printer to El Salvador to begin construction. ICON says its 3D-printed houses will create minimal waste and labor costs are significantly reduced. The company also intends to build homes in the US eventually. It’s a compelling solution to solving housing shortages but one that could be contentious among labor unions that represent workers.
It’s almost cliché that tech innovations happen in the high-end, for-profit segment long before they filter down to the masses, where innovation could serve the greatest social good. ICON and New Story are challenging that premise. Lafci uses the example of latency in cellphone availability to reach the African continent as the reason she believes in the endeavor. “(ICON) believes, as do I, that 3D printing is going to be a method for all kinds of housing,” she says.
But the company is already looking past the global housing crises to think about communities that will one day live off-planet. “One of the big challenges is how are we going to create habitats in space,” Ballard says. “You’re not going to open a two by four and open screws. It’s one of the more promising potential habitat technologies.”
]]>The station wagon is the vinyl record of the car industry. Rare, purist, and extremely cool when you find one, which means they are primed for a comeback.
So then it’s not shocking that the Buick Regal TourX I test drove stopped folks in New York traffic. It’s still an anomaly on public streets; GM told me only a few hundred have shipped. The first question everyone asked was, “What is it?” Turns out the Buick emblem on the hood, originally created in 1908 and among the oldest in the auto industry, doesn’t resonate the same way, as say, the three-pointed star. And very few people remember back to when the original Buick Roadmaster Estate Wagon first hit the streets in 1947.
So for contemporary purposes, the Buick wagon is brand new to America and the northeast corridor where I live, where the most popular wagon, the Subaru Outback, is a common sight parked on the street. Other wagonesque offerings include the Volkswagen Golf Alltrack, the Audi A4 Allroad, the Volvo V60 and V90 Cross Country, and the Mercedes-Benz E63 wagon. It’s a relatively short list.
In Europe, where station wagons and vinyl never went out of style, the Regal is rebadged as the Opel Insignia Country Tourer. Buick co-developed this vehicle with Opel before GM sold off its European brand. The European reverence for the wagon is one reason American journalists like to cover the Geneva Motor Show. If you ask most automotive journalists about some of their favorite rides, inevitably a station wagon will make the top ten.
But in America, the TourX is a paradox between the past and future. Here station wagons have faded to near obscurity, thanks to the rise of the SUV. But obscurity may work in the brand’s favor. The opening lines of the Don DeLillo classic novel White Noise about the impact of technology on civilization captured the station wagon’s cultural identity in the ‘80s. “The station wagons arrived at noon, a long shining line that coursed through the west campus. In single file they eased around the orange I-beam sculpture and moved toward the dormitories.” It was the ride dorky parents schlepped their kids around town in, which became a bad joke. In other words, the station wagon was the original minivan.
But why are wagons cool?
That image, three decades later, has changed. “Customers don’t have a perception of what wagons were,” says Doug Osterhoff, marketing manager for Buick Cars, when I asked him about why they decided to build a wagon. “They didn’t live through woodsided wagons, and they are very cool, in the now. The whole perception is different.” In fact, Buick, long-known as an old timer’s car, is looking to the Regal TourX to add a bit of swagger.
But why are wagons cool? Why do car journalists fawn? For one, a station wagon performs more like a car, and Buick succeeded in building a wagon that’s fun to drive. The turbo engine on the TourX lends itself toward its authoritative power. It produces 250 horsepower and 295 pound feet of torque. “It has car-like driving dynamics,” Osterhoff says. “There are things about SUVs that [customers] don’t like. They prefer to be down, not up.” It’s ready for snowy climates and is equipped with standard all-wheel drive, a system used in other Buick vehicles like the Lacrosse.
Unlike the station wagons of yesteryear (shout out to my friend who drives a 1996 Chevy Caprice wagon with a powerful Corvette engine,) it doesn’t feel like a long, dangerous saloon, but actually has nimble handling. “The hardest part is getting the right proportions,” Bob Boniface, design director for Buick Exteriors, told me. “People can’t articulate what makes it athletic.”
The other plus factor for wagon customers is that they are roomier than cars, one reason the crossover segment is booming. “The utility of the cubic space storage is more than the big crossovers,” Osterhoff says. “They feel safer and more in control in their cars. They have a need for utility. People that own wagons, they don’t need a garage mate for their day-to-day ride. They keep their stuff in the back of the car.” (Unless you street-park like all those Outback drivers do in New York City.)
Creating more space was part of the design directive for Buick. It has the same wheelbase as its sedan counterpart, the Regal Sportback, but adds 3.4 inches in length, hence what accounts for that extra space for grocery-getting. Buick goes all-in on the TourX’s elongated elegant form. It’s over a foot longer than the Volvo V60 Cross Country, and is the longest in its class.
GM’s grasp of the European market through the Opel brand influenced design know-how. “In Europe they are more pragmatic and focused on efficiency,” Boniface says.
The Regal TourX calls itself luxury, but it’s not a fancy-pants wagon. Some of the interior materials feel plasticy. So while Mercedes-Benz gives the E63 Wagon variant high-touch piano gloss and multiple screens, Regal TourX is more knobs and buttons of the old-school ilk. Some of the accoutrements a tech-minded passenger would desire — wireless charging, rear park assist, adaptive cruise control, and the cavernous sliding moonroof — add on to the $35,070 base price. The car I tested retails for $41,765.
But I would be remiss if I didn’t pause to focus on Buick’s obsession with quiet as a key part of its appeal. Last year I visited GM’s Noise and Vibration Lab in Milford, Michigan. It’s the auto industry equivalent to Skywalker Sound. Buick uses parachute material, among other nifty tricks to make the cabin of its vehicle sound like silence. In other words, there’s no room in a Buick for white noise.
While I’ve always had a hankering for wagons and record players, it’s still a surprise when they come back into style as if they were new. Who knows, perhaps one day dial-up modems and flip phones will make a comeback, too.
Photography by Tamara Warren / The Verge
]]>Film audiences who aren’t already claustrophobic might feel that way after watching The Chamber, a new thriller set almost entirely off the coast of North Korea in the cabin of an overturned submarine stuck at the bottom of the Yellow Sea. The plot — a looming conflict between the US and North Korea — is either poorly timed or extremely well-timed, given recent global events, but the real story is the classic moral quandary of how humans behave when trying to survive.
Mats, a Swedish submarine ship captain for hire (played by Force Majeure star Johannes Bah Kuhnke), gets entangled in espionage when his boss orders him to pilot an American special ops team to an undisclosed location in a rickety Cold War-era submarine called the Aurora. The American mission is led by the steely Edwards (Charlotte Salt), with Denholm (Elliot Levey) and Parks (James McArdle), rounding out the three-person unit. Before they submerge, Mats says, “This isn’t some fancy Navy Seal submarine. She ain’t a high-tech sporty thing.” Only Mats knows how to maneuver the old finicky sub, but his boss has agreed to let the Americans call the shots.
“She ain’t a high-tech sporty thing.”
The film’s conflict comes from the team’s mysterious mission, which revolves around destroying what appears to be an RQ-170 surveillance drone that’s been hidden from the North Koreans in the Yellow Sea. When Edwards first spots the hidden drone, she marvels at it. “An RQ4, a global hawk UAV, a US unmanned aircraft with full targeting and surveillance capabilities. It’s a drone. Beautiful, isn’t she?” It becomes clear the she will go to any lengths to destroy the drone, even if they destroy the fragile submarine in the process.
In an interview with The Verge, writer-director Ben Parker says the premise of the film was inspired partly by the terror of drone strikes. “A drone that crashed in the ocean was where the kernel of the story came from. I’ve always been fascinated, or rather terrified, by drones. My first fascination, as a child, was of planes and aeronautics. I would have posters of planes on my walls.” But with the advent of remotely piloted, weaponized drones, his admiration turned to fear. “The disconnect of using unmanned aircraft for attacks is something that scares me. And The Chamber was really about all my darkest fears rolled into one, so I wanted the plot to revolve around the recovery of one of these drones.”
More than one of Parker’s fears makes its way into the film. He is claustrophobic, and the movie often feels that way as well. Jon Bunker, a concept artist on Gravity, conceptualized the close quarters of the submarine. The set was slightly larger than a real cockpit to make space for the camera, but the cramped space still feels oppressive — and on the verge of falling apart.
“I wanted it to be a raggedy submarine… to be fairly old and broken, because I saw, first hand, how advanced and safe modern subs were,” Parker says. “I wanted to be able to create a sense of dread in the audience, that this sub was like an old beat-up car, on its last legs and ready to collapse. And that this was the only option available. I think the use of an old, beat up ship must be influenced by my love of the Millennium Falcon as a kid. A reluctant hero, piloting a patched up tin-can.”
Parker also got inspiration and insight from his uncle, who was also a submarine pilot. “He was in the Special Forces, and he used to tell me stories about submarines. When I wrote the script, he was someone I could go back to and see what was plausible… He’d go down to great depths in these submarines and I was in suspense [to hear] what he found down there.”
As part of his research, Parker visited a NATO rescue submarine at Fort William in Scotland and was struck by the ordinary cameras on the exterior. “They were there for durability, not beautiful camera footage, so when it came to shooting the exterior viewpoints, I thought why not use the same thing they do on the real sub?” he says. “Using GoPros allowed us to get the look and with most maneuverability among the miniatures and sets. I really wanted to use on board GoPro footage for some of the interior action too again, to ramp up the realistic feel, but we didn’t end up using this in the film.”
Nor was The Chamber itself a high-tech or big-budget endeavor. With a budget of less than a million dollars, the crew had to be creative to film believable action sequences. “I didn’t want it to look low-res, but I did like the idea of confining things to a small space. It was even more fun. Four people stuck in a prison cell wouldn’t have been as dynamic,” Parker says.
Instead of CGI, the crew used old Hollywood tricks to create murky underwater sequences with GoPro cameras. “I realized I was emulating a lot of my B-movie inspirations, shooting models, higher camera rates, and then slowing it down,” says Parker. He cites the clever, sometimes outrageous camera work of filmmaker Roger Corman as an influence to create the effect of the ocean, and a way around budget constraints.
The film was shot in 23 days in a warehouse in Wales. “We constructed [the submarine] from the ground up ourselves. We had to film everything in sequence,” Parker says. As they filmed scenes where sub begins to fill with water, the actors had to stand in water for hours at a time, often while it was too cold or too hot. And then there was the unnerving pairing of electricity and water.
“We used visual effects where we needed to, but to also have real, practical effects wherever we could. And of course, being a ‘submerged’ thriller, I knew the limitations of mixing practical water and CGI effects. I wanted to try and do as much in-camera as I could,” he says. “We had a big net above the models with flour. Someone would tap the net, and little bits would come down with dust.”
For the final sequence, the cast and crew shot off the south coast of the UK near Devon. “We all jumped into the water and slowly drifted out to the sea,” says Parker of the last days filming on location.
The Chamber is in theaters, On Demand, and On Digital HD February 23rd.
]]>