It was a sweltering Sunday in Brooklyn. Instead of being wasteful and spending $10 on a five-minute Uber, I decided to walk the 20 minutes to a cutesy Japanese stationery cafe with an even cutesier name. Despite the 85 percent humidity, my vanity demanded I wear a full face of makeup with a snatched nose contour. Sweat was leaking out of every pore, melting said nose contour into my sunglasses. Foundation ran down my neck and stained my shirt collar. I’m pretty sure all of Williamsburg could see I had pit stains.

So I was taken aback when a suave artiste walking a French bulldog stopped me, pointed to the Oakley Meta HSTN Limited Edition sunglasses on my face, and said, “Yo, those are siiick — do you love them?!” 

They proceeded to rattle off some questions. I was flabbergasted to realize this person was genuinely curious and eagerly wanted to hear my impressions. I managed a “Just got them! I think they’re cool?” before scuttling away like the awkward turtle I am. 

My flabbers were even more gasted when I realized this was the first time anyone had ever noticed that I was wearing a pair of smart glasses. 

Oakley Meta HSTN Limited Edition

The Oakley version of Meta’s smart glasses adds 3K video and PRIZM lenses, and roughly doubles the estimated battery life to eight hours.

Score: 6

Pros	Cons
Longer battery Higher video resolution Makes greenery look more green	Not as fashionably versatile as the Ray-Bans Harder to take out of the case than the Ray-Bans More expensive than the Ray-Bans Basically, the Ray-Bans are a better value

Where to Buy:

• $499.99 at Meta

I’ve been thinking about that interaction a lot while testing the Oakley glasses. After so many years as a smart glasses skeptic, it’s wild to see how successful Meta’s been with the Ray-Bans — the Oakleys’ predecessor. EssilorLuxottica said in its earnings results earlier this week that sales have tripled year over year. And not just among techies. Among regular people. Just the other day, a friend sent me a TikTok with footage from a Stray Kids concert recorded by the Ray-Ban Meta glasses. Shoulda done this for our show, they’d texted. A quick search showed that someone at our exact show, seated not that far from us, actually had. 

When I first reviewed the Ray-Ban Meta glasses, I knew something had shifted. But it’s mind-boggling that under two years later, Meta has launched multiple limited editions and a Super Bowl commercial, let alone an option from another brand to reach new audiences. 

Where Ray-Bans are classic and versatile, Oakleys conjure images of Olympic cyclists or Coach Taylor from Friday Night Lights. The young’uns have also glommed onto the brand as Y2K fashion is all the rage again. 

Stylistically, the Oakleys are more polarizing. Not just because they have PRIZM lenses, either. Both my spouse and bestie scrunched their noses at the concept of white sunglasses. Multiple friends and coworkers pointed out the slanted area by the nose bridge, asking, “Why the hell does it do that?” (The answer is that Oakley’s regular HSTN glasses do that. It’s an Oakley thing.) Anyone can rock these, provided they bring a bit of swagger. Many people won’t feel comfortable with such a bold look. 

Ironically, the Oakley case is much more boring and feels cheaper in your hand than the Meta Ray-Bans case. It’s also much harder to get the glasses out. I was afraid I’d break the charging contact while pulling them out.

The main differences are a bump up in video resolution from 1080p to 3K, roughly double the battery to eight hours on a single charge, and Oakley’s PRIZM lenses on the limited edition. The extra battery is nice, since that’s one of the main complaints about Meta glasses for power users. Meanwhile, the PRIZM lenses enhance contrast and certain colors. It sounds like a marketing spiel, but I don’t think I’d truly experienced green until I saw the way trees and grass look through these glasses. The kicker is that all these things make the Oakleys more expensive. The standard Oakleys will start at $399, compared to $299 for the Ray-Bans. This limited edition version costs $499. 

That’s hard to swallow. I understand boosting 3K video resolution and battery life. Oakleys are more likely to appeal to outdoorsy folks. Those are the kinds of updates that crowd would want. But photo quality is identical. 3K videos are noticeably sharper, and you’d get decent action footage if you can figure out framing. (Once again, I was foiled by the corner of my baseball cap, my bangs, and a tendency to tilt my head.) Filming in 3K is a battery guzzler. Recording three 2.5-minute 3K videos of my cat and uploading them via Wi-Fi to my phone ate a whopping 20 percent of my battery. 

Our supervising video producer, Vjeran Pavic, copped a pair for himself and had the same issues with framing, but he adds that everything has a “very HDR look.” That’s not a bad thing. It’s the right move as everything needs to pop, be simple, and have consistent exposure. The benefit is hands-free, point-of-view convenience. It’s never going to trump the quality of a high-end phone or action cam.

The Ray-Bans and Oakleys have the same number of mics and placement, but may fit your face differently. I sound clearer on calls from the Ray-Bans. The glasses have different nose pads, so because of my low nose bridge, I ended up sounding muffled on the Oakleys. You can fix this, however, in the mic troubleshooting settings. 

I know what I’d say now if I could travel back in time to that street corner in Williamsburg. 

I don’t love these glasses, Mr. Ludicrously Stylish Brooklyn Man. A more accurate answer is, I appreciate them. While they fit more easily into my life than I’d anticipated, they’re more a “nice to have” than a “must have.” As a runner, nothing will quite beat my Shokz OpenRun Pro 2 for open-ear audio, but I’ve enjoyed using these on my summer runs when the sun is punishingly bright. But the real question, sir, is how much do you like AI? How much do you trust Meta?

These smart glasses now connect to the Meta AI app instead of the Meta View companion app. Meta purposefully calls these AI glasses, so you can rest assured that association isn’t going anywhere. There are now privacy stipulations where you can’t opt out of voice recordings being stored in the cloud, among other things. That feels… dystopian, but for the blind and low-vision community, this might be relatively small potatoes. These glasses and their Live AI features have empowered them to live more independently. For content creators, the camera and livestreaming capabilities open new creative avenues. 

If that sounds appealing, go for the Ray-Bans, because they’re more versatile for indoor and outdoor wear and are $100 to $200 less. That is, unless you’re much more of an outdoorsy or content creator type. In that case, the 3K resolution and extra battery life make more sense. 

Now, you’ll have to excuse me, Mr. Unreasonably Chic for a Heat Wave. I’m going to power-walk back to AC, put my reviewer hat back on, and ponder this conversation and what it means that you could tell I was wearing smart glasses. Hey, Meta, can you tell me where the nearest bodega is? 

(Spoiler: It could not.) 

Few things scratch my brain like a good beef. Kendrick vs. Drake. Justin Baldoni vs. Blake Lively. On my beat, it’s usually two companies fighting over health tech patents. So-and-so copied a feature from so-and-so. The latest dispute on my radar is all about semantics. More specifically, the exact meaning of wellness. 

Let me catch you up. On July 15th, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) sent Whoop a letter. In it, the FDA declared that Whoop — maker of a niche fitness tracker favored by elite athletes — had crossed a line. Its new Blood Pressure Insights feature, the regulator said, was being marketed to customers without undergoing the proper clearance process. 

In response, Whoop pulled out the W word: wellness. 

In the world of health and wearable tech, “wellness” is sort of like a “get out of jail free” card. Some advanced health features, like EKGs and atrial fibrillation notifications, require regulatory clearance before consumers can use them. These features could be interpreted as diagnostic in nature or prompt a person to make a medical decision. Others, like step tracking and blood oxygen measurements, don’t require FDA oversight at all. They’re simply meant to make living a healthy life easier by helping you visualize certain measurable markers. Those features fall under the wellness umbrella. They’re “just for fun.” 

Whoop’s Blood Pressure Insights feature, however, lies in murkier territory.

The way Whoop’s feature works is that a user takes readings with a regular blood pressure cuff for calibration. Once that process is complete, Whoop says its tracker uses metrics like “heart rate, heart rate variability, and blood flow patterns during sleep” to give an estimate of a person’s systolic and diastolic blood pressure each morning. The FDA contends that “providing blood pressure estimation is not a low-risk function” and that a blood pressure estimate inherently implies you’re diagnosing hypo- or hypertension. In a statement, Whoop says it “respectfully disagree[s]” and that this particular feature is more akin to tracking your sleeping respiratory rate. Under the wellness umbrella, Whoop argues it’s able to bring an innovative feature to the masses more quickly. 

Whoop and the FDA both have points. It’s not a stretch to think that a user may get a few “high” blood pressure estimates, assume they have high blood pressure, and make health decisions informed by that assumption. At the same time, it’s clearly labeled as a beta feature, and similar “diagnostic adjacent” features are available without FDA regulation. I’ve lost count of how many sleep trackers claim to track “breathing disturbances.” That may not be explicitly marketed as a sleep apnea detection metric (that would require FDA clearance), but that’s semantics. The obvious reason to include it is to flag when a person might want to check themselves for sleep apnea. 

The crux of it all is identifying high- and low-risk features for causing harm. Many cases are clear-cut. Natural Cycles, for example, is a period tracking app that claims you can use it as digital contraception using temperature data from wearables like the Oura Ring. It’s obvious that a regulatory body should vet a high-stakes feature like that. On the flip side, Samsung’s new Antioxidant Index feature for its Galaxy Watch 8 is a silly metric that tells you whether you’ve eaten enough fruits and veggies. Even if it’s inaccurate as hell (I was able to fool it by scanning a Cheez-It), it’s not likely to harm your health. 

Where the FDA’s current process falls short is the increasing number of features that lie somewhere in the middle. Take the Oura Ring. A friend just asked me whether they should get one based on a TikTok video. In said video, celebrity DJ Dillon Francis says the main reason he has an Oura Ring is because it predicts when he’s getting sick. This is the Symptom Radar feature, which, in simple terms, flags when you might be getting sick — and it’s based on real clinical research conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic. It sounds diagnostic, which requires FDA clearance. But it’s not. It’s considered a wellness feature because it doesn’t tell you what you’re falling ill with — just that you might be showing “early signs of a health change.” And while there’s a distinct difference between a diagnosis and a heads-up, it can feel awfully similar to a layperson.

Also, Whoop isn’t the only company exploring blood pressure tech. Samsung has a similar feature that’s unavailable in the US, as it hasn’t been cleared by the FDA. According to Bloomberg, Apple has also been working on an Apple Watch feature that flags when your blood pressure spikes above your baseline, but it reportedly won’t spit out direct readings like a continuous glucose monitor would — possibly to avoid FDA clearance as a “wellness” feature. 

Beyond blood pressure, Samsung and Apple are also widely rumored to be working on blood glucose monitoring features, where the stakes for diabetics could be sky-high. If or when those features do become available, it’s possible that companies will adjust how they work to more broadly fit under a wellness label. For instance, instead of glucose readings, you get a trend line or score. I’m skeptical of the average person being able to discern the nuance when even seasoned tech journalists sometimes struggle with the correct verbiage. 

Maybe it seems silly to sound the alarm over semantics. But as politicians advocate for greater wearable adoption, the stakes have never been higher. In a better, ideal world, companies would abolish phrases like “clinically proven” or “medical grade” from marketing. The FDA would figure out a clearer framework for the design of a wellness feature versus a medical one. But we don’t live in an ideal world — and that means it’s up to the consumer to know the difference. Frankly, that’s not going so well. Perhaps that means it’s time we acknowledge that wellness isn’t an innocuous word anymore.

It used to be easy to pick an Apple Watch. All you had to do was choose whether you wanted the larger model or the smaller one. Then Apple added optional cellular connectivity. Then, a more affordable Watch SE (now in its second generation) and, in 2022, the rugged Apple Watch Ultra (also now in its second generation). Suddenly, there are lots of options.

Now that the Series 10 has been out for nearly a year, perfectly good older versions of the Apple Watch are regularly getting discounted as retailers try to empty their inventory. You may also see more refurbished versions of these older models pop up. If you’re interested in more premium materials, like stainless steel, this is a great way to get a fancier version of last year’s watch. You won’t be missing out on too much, either. The past few years have seen iterative updates in terms of hardware — and the bulk of new features come from software updates. With that said, keep in mind that the latest version of watchOS, watchOS 11, doesn’t support the Series 4, 5, and first-gen SE. The same can be said of watchOS 26, which is slated to arrive in the fall.

Buying refurbished is one way that you may be able to upgrade from an older model without sacrificing blood oxygen. Due to a patent battle with Masimo, new Series 9 and Ultra 2 models sold in the US after January 18th, 2024, no longer have this feature. This is not a big deal for most people, but if it’s important to you, older watches and Series 9 and Ultra 2 units sold by Apple before January 18th, 2024, still retain the feature. (As do watches overseas. The ban only impacts US units.)

What about the newer Series 10? In a nutshell, it’s got a bigger screen, it’s about 10 percent thinner, and it’s lighter than previous models. It’s also got an FDA-cleared sleep apnea detection feature. There are a ton of new colors and finishes, with titanium replacing stainless steel. All in all, it’s an iterative update but one we find meaningful in terms of readability and wearability.

So much choice can lead to analysis paralysis. But don’t worry. I’ve tested every single version of the Apple Watch you can buy right now — in addition to basically every other fitness watch and smartwatch on the market — and can steer you in the right direction.

Should you get an Apple Watch?

The Apple Watch is the best overall smartwatch for iPhone users. Many smartwatches are better than the Apple Watch for hardcore athletes, even with the Ultra models in the mix. But other watches fall short when it comes to productivity, safety features, controlling your smart home, and interacting with other Apple devices and services. And the Apple Watch has the most robust third-party app ecosystem of any smartwatch on the market. 

By their nature, wearables are incredibly personal devices — and you won’t get the benefits of an Apple Watch if you don’t wear it regularly. The last thing you want is to spend hundreds of dollars on a thing that ends up collecting dust in a drawer. The best way to avoid this is to stack the deck in your favor and prioritize comfort. Before you try to start mulling over which Apple Watch model you should get, take a second to figure out which size and strap material will best fit your wrist. 

The SE and Series watches come in two sizes each. The SE comes in 40mm and 44mm, while the Series 7, 8, and 9 are 41mm and 45mm. The new Series 10 ups the size again to 42mm and 46mm. The larger models are better for readability, while the smaller ones are more comfortable for those with petite wrists. Both the SE and the Series watches have aluminum cases, but the Series 10 now comes in titanium, too. (Older models come in stainless steel.) Most people will be fine with aluminum, but if you’re clumsy or very active, you’ll benefit from the extra durability offered by stainless steel or titanium. You might also just like the look better — and that’s valid since watches are a personal piece of tech. Just be prepared to pay a few hundred bucks more for that.

As for straps, we recommend the nylon sport loop, as it’s the most breathable option, has the easiest clasp, and is less irritating than the silicone options, which is great for sensitive skin. If you’re looking for more fashionable options, we recommend checking out Amazon or Etsy for a wider variety of styles and more affordable pricing. You’ll want to check third parties for leather accessories, too, as Apple announced in 2023 that it would no longer make leather accessories in a bid to achieve carbon neutrality.

The Ultra and Ultra 2 both come in one size — 49mm — and with titanium cases. They come with their own special straps, too: the Trail Loop, Alpine Loop, and Ocean Band. As their names suggest, they’re geared toward runners, hikers, and divers, but you can pick whichever one suits your fancy. We recommend the Trail Loop, as it’s the lightest and most versatile of the three. All the Ultra straps work with any 44mm or 45mm Series watch, and the Ultra is compatible with any 44mm or 45mm Apple Watch strap.

And while the Apple Watch is the best smartwatch you can get as an iPhone user, you can also always check out our fitness tracker buying guide.

Apple Watch Series, SE, or Ultra?

Apple Watch Series 10

The Apple Watch Series 10 has a larger, wide-angle OLED display with up to 30 percent more screen area. It’s thinner and lighter than its predecessors, yet it charges faster and features the same fitness and wellness features.

Score: 8

Pros	Cons
Bigger display but not bulky Wide-angle OLED is neat Much faster charging Sleep apnea detection has potential	Lack of blood oxygen (in US) may impact your upgrade plans Another year of minor updates

Where to Buy:

• $399 $299 at Amazon
• $399 $299 at Walmart
• $399 at Best Buy

The latest Apple Watch, the Series 10, is a more modest update. It primarily focuses on making the watches more comfortable while adding a larger, wide-angle OLED display. If you’re upgrading from an older model, you’ll definitely notice that you can see more from the wrist. The speakers now play music and podcasts, and voice isolation on calls has been improved. There’s an added depth and water temperature sensor, which makes it a better companion for water sports as well. Fast charging has also been meaningfully improved. On the health front, Apple has brought FDA-cleared sleep apnea detection to the watch, along with the Series 9 and Ultra 2.

We recommend the second-gen Apple Watch SE for younger people and first-time smartwatch buyers. If you’re upgrading from an earlier Apple Watch, you want an always-on display, or you want more advanced health tracking, you should consider the Series 10. And if you want the brightest screen, the best durability and battery life, and even more advanced fitness features, we recommend the Ultra 2.

The Series 10 is Apple’s flagship smartwatch. Compared to earlier models, it’s going to get you the fastest processor, quick charging, a larger display, and all the latest sensors. Prices start at $399 for the 42mm version and $429 for the 46mm, but you can often find the 42mm model on sale for around $299. Adding LTE connectivity will add $100 to the price, plus whatever your carrier charges for the service. Prices start at $699 for the polished titanium models.

The second-gen SE has a nylon composite back, which helps shave $30 off the original’s price. You can get a cellular version, and it supports many of the same advanced features as the last-last-gen Series 8, like fall detection, emergency calling, Fitness Plus, Apple Pay, and Apple Watch For Your Kids. The biggest difference is that it lacks an always-on display, an EKG sensor, temperature sensors, and a SpO2 sensor. The display is also slightly smaller on both sizes of the SE. It starts at $249 for the 40mm and $279 for the 44mm, but you can regularly find it online starting around $170. Adding LTE will tack on an extra $50 in addition to your carrier’s fees. 

2022 Apple Watch SE (40mm, GPS)

The latest SE borrows a few features from the Series 8, including the same chipset and Crash Detection feature, but it’s an otherwise subtle upgrade from the last-gen SE.

Score: 7

Pros	Cons
S8 chip is still speedy enough Offers the bulk of watchOS 11 features Excellent entry-level watch	The bezels are thick Smaller display isn’t good for elderly relatives No always-on display Fewer sensors

Where to Buy:

• $249 $169 at Amazon
• $249 $169 at Walmart
• $249 $169 at Best Buy

To be perfectly honest, if you’re young and healthy, you’re not really missing out on EKG or SpO2. (Also, newer watches sold in the US currently have the SpO2 feature disabled anyway.) The SE’s heart rate sensor is still capable of providing abnormal heart rate alerts. Right now, Apple’s SpO2 features are limited to spot checks. There’s not much you can do with that information, and unlike the EKGs, this is only cleared for general wellness purposes. It will not be able to replace a fingertip pulse oximeter, and you should never use it in this way.

The main purpose of the EKG sensor is to enable atrial fibrillation detection — and if your doctor’s given you a clean bill of health, you will likely only use this feature once or twice. According to the American Heart Association, the biggest risk factors for AFib are advanced age, underlying heart conditions, high blood pressure, family history, and sleep apnea, among other lifestyle choices. If this doesn’t apply to you, the SE is still going to give you an excellent health tracking experience and all the same smart features. Young, first-time buyers may as well save the extra cash — so long as the lack of an always-on display isn’t a deal-breaker. 

You can’t really see much of a difference between the Ultra on the left and the Ultra 2 on the right.

There are some situations where opting for the Series 10 is the better choice, however, like if you want an always-on display or need to have the latest and greatest. The larger, wide-angle OLED display also provides much better readability for anyone with bad eyesight. It’s also the better choice if you have a heart condition or are at a higher risk of developing AFib. If you suspect you may have sleep apnea, you’ll also need a Series 9, 10, or Ultra 2 to access that feature.

Apple Watch Ultra 2

Score: 8

Pros	Cons
The Modular Ultra face is a data nerd’s dream Precision Finding Minor Siri and screen brightness improvements Double-tap gesture is great	No pink The minor changes feel even more minor with the Ultra Need iPhone 15 or 16 for Precision Finding

Where to Buy:

• $799 $759 at Amazon (with Alpine Loop)
• $799 $779 at Amazon (with Trail Loop)
• $799 at Amazon (with Ocean Band)

The Ultra 2 currently sits atop the lineup as Apple’s premium smartwatch. It’s visually distinct from both the Series and SE — and at 49mm, it’s the biggest of them all. Not only that, it has increased durability, water resistance, and a raised lip to protect the flat display. It also has an additional water temperature and depth sensor for divers, three microphones, and two speakers, which enable the Siren. It’s also got the Action button, which can be programmed for various activities, pause workouts, and trigger the Siren.

At $799, the Ultra 2 is the most expensive Apple Watch, but every model comes equipped with LTE capability. If you have an Ultra and are wondering if you should upgrade to the second-gen model, the answer is no. If you have an Ultra 2 and are wondering if you should upgrade to the new black color, the answer is also no. (Admittedly, it does look quite nice.) It’s too soon, and there’s not enough of a difference. We recommend the Ultra 2 for new buyers only.

If battery life is your highest priority, getting either Ultra is the best choice. In testing, we got up to 60 hours without Low Power Mode enabled. However, if you use about one hour of GPS tracking a day or take calls, you’re more likely to get around two days. It’s also the better choice if you frequently hike, dive, or run trails. While marketed as a hardcore watch for explorers, in our opinion, it’s more of an aspirational watch for weekend warriors and intermediate athletes — or anyone who wants to be at that level.

You’re not going to beat either Ultra on battery life, but you can stretch out the battery life on the Series 4 or later with Low Power Mode. You can even sleep track with Low Power Mode on, though it’ll turn off background health sensors. With the Series 10, Apple has improved fast charging as well. Official estimates are that you can get 0 to 80 percent in 30 minutes, which roughly matches our real-world testing. Just be sure you’re using the correct charging accessories.

If you have smaller wrists, you may want to opt for the Series 10 as it has fast charging and is more comfortable to wear long-term. Faster charging comes in clutch when you’re about to head to bed and you’ve only got 15 percent battery. Also, if you’re the type that values futureproofing, the Series 10’s hardware will be able to support newer features for a longer period of time thanks to its newer processor. This is why folks who love their watch and are looking to upgrade from a Series 4 or older should also pick the Series 10. If you’re already in the habit of wearing the watch daily, you’ll get more mileage out of it as the SE is more of a gateway device, and the Ultra is overkill for the average Joe.  

The best Apple Watch if you’re on a budget

2022 Apple Watch SE (40mm, GPS)

The latest SE borrows a few features from the Series 8, including the same chipset and Crash Detection feature, but it’s an otherwise subtle upgrade from the last-gen SE.

Score: 7

Pros	Cons
S8 chip is still speedy enough Offers the bulk of watchOS 11 features Excellent entry-level watch	The bezels are thick Smaller display isn’t good for elderly relatives No always-on display Fewer sensors

Where to Buy:

• $249 $169 at Amazon
• $249 $169 at Walmart
• $249 $169 at Best Buy

The latest Watch SE is the way to go for people who want to futureproof their hardware without breaking the bank (so long as you’re okay forgoing a larger display). You’re getting the same processor as the Series 8 and original Ultra, plus Crash Detection.

While the second-gen SE is an excellent watch, it’s not always the right choice. It’s meant to be a gateway watch, so it’s best suited to folks who are completely new to the Apple Watch and want to spend as little as possible. If you’re looking to upgrade from an older watch but don’t want to pony up for the Series 10, there’s another option: buying a used or refurbished Apple Watch.

Buying secondhand devices is also better for the environment and a more affordable way to get more expensive materials. Materials like sapphire glass, stainless steel, or titanium can add hundreds to the price of a new watch. It’s also a good way to save money if you’re just not excited by the Series 10’s features but want more than what the SE offers.

It’ll take some patience to find the best price and the model you want. After all, you’re limited by what’s available. However, there are several sites that offer older models. Sometimes, you can also find deals and sales as well. If you’re worried about getting scammed, look for deals recommended by sources you trust (cough, cough, Verge Deals). Apple also sells its own refurbished models, which come with a full Apple warranty and are generally in a “like new” condition, though the selection can be limited, and you likely won’t pay less than a new SE. Sites like Back Market will also allow you to sort by condition and obtain a 12-month warranty. 

If you’re considering a used or refurbished model, we recommend the Series 7 or Series 8, as they offer a larger screen for improved readability. We also recommend that you use $250 as a benchmark since that’s the price of a base model Watch SE. With that said, if you’re getting premium materials, going a little higher is fine. Do not get a refurbished Series 5 or older. Although you can find them for $100 (sometimes less!), they can’t run the latest software and even struggle to update the newest software they do support.

The best Apple Watch for kids

2022 Apple Watch SE (40mm, LTE)

The latest SE for 2022 borrows a few features from the Series 8, including the same chipset and Crash Detection feature, but it’s an otherwise subtle upgrade from the last-gen SE.

Score: 7

Pros	Cons
S8 chip is still speedy enough Offers the bulk of watchOS 11 features Excellent entry-level watch	The bezels are thick Smaller display isn’t good for elderly relatives No always-on display Fewer sensors

Where to Buy:

• $299 $219 at Amazon
• $299 $219 at Best Buy
• $299 $219.99 at Target

If you want your child to have an Apple Watch, we recommend picking a cellular Apple Watch SE or, if you can find one, a refurbished Series 4, 5, or 6 with cellular. All of these watches come in smaller sizes than the Series 7, 8, or 9, which will likely better fit their wrist. Also, the lower price will give you better peace of mind if you have a rambunctious kid. They likely won’t need many of the marquee features found in watchOS 11, either. That being said, if you want the most futureproof options, the second-gen SE and Series 6 are the best choices.

Since you’re buying for children, you’ll likely want to use Apple Watch For Your Kids — formerly known as Family Setup — as it will give you greater parental controls. However, there are technical specifications that you’ll need to match in order to use it. You’ll need a cellular version of the device, and it must at least support watchOS 7. Apple’s support page also states that you need a Series 4 or later or an Apple Watch SE to use it.

If you opt for the family route, not every feature will be available. While you can get Apple Pay and certain health features, you will not get the following: health data sharing, respiratory rate, irregular heart rhythm notifications, EKG, Cycle Tracking, Sleep, Blood Oxygen, Podcasts, Remote, News, Home, and Shortcuts.

The best Apple Watch for older relatives

Apple Watch Series 10 (42mm, LTE)

The Series 10’s display is comparable in size to the Ultra 2’s but the watch itself is roughly 30 percent thinner and half the weight.

Score: 8

Pros	Cons
Bigger display but not bulky Wide-angle OLED is neat Much faster charging Sleep apnea detection has potential	Lack of blood oxygen (in US) may impact your upgrade plans Another year of minor updates

Where to Buy:

• $499 $379.99 at Amazon
• $499 $379.99 at Walmart
• $499 $399 at Best Buy

This can be a tricky one, but we recommend a cellular Series 9 or 10. 

For starters, the larger screen is much easier on the eyes. You can also increase the text size to be larger than on the SE or older Apple Watches. The always-on display aids accessibility, especially if arm mobility is a consideration. You’ll also get the full suite of health features, including irregular heartbeat alerts, walking steadiness, EKGs, fall detection, sleep apnea detection, and emergency calling. These models also have the double tap feature and improved Siri functionality, which may be helpful for elderly relatives with dexterity issues.

You can use the Ultra, but you should keep its size and weight in mind. Depending on your loved one’s wrist size and health, it may not make sense. Both sizes of the Series 10 have comparable screen sizes but are much lighter and more comfortable to wear. 

If your older relative has an iPhone and you’re hoping to use this for health reasons, we also don’t recommend using Apple’s family setup. That’s because you cannot use features like irregular heart rhythm notifications, EKG, and health data sharing. If your relative doesn’t have an iPhone, however, it’s a fine option. You’ll still get high and low heart rate notifications, walking steadiness, and fall detection. 

Update, July 15th: Adjusted pricing / availability and added several new links.