Epic v. Google: everything we learned in Fortnite court
See all Stories
Earlier today, Judge Donato let Google say the word iPhone — and it opened the door for Epic’s attorney Lauren Moskowitz to point out what isn’t in the document Google used to justify spending hundreds of millions of dollars on addressing the “contagion effect” of game developers abandoning the Play Store.
What isn’t in the document: Apple. It’s not listed in the “Competitors Aggressively Pursuing Gaming” section. It’s not anywhere.
“Competition with Apple is not being discussed when we’re talking about contagion risk, right?” asked Moskowitz.
“Yes, contagion risk is talking about developers getting their content off Google Play,” Koh admitted. Does that change the conversation around market definition?
Most Popular
- All the news from Nintendo’s July 2025 Direct showcase
- Epic just won its Google lawsuit again, and Android may never be the same
- Inside the LG G5’s shocking last-place finish at the 2025 TV Shootout
- 8BitDo’s wireless Nintendo 64 controller is now available
- Sharge added a rechargeable battery to its sleek retractable charger